Student Loan Blog : student loan default rates

Federal Student Loan Lenders Fight for Survival

Student Loan Girl — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:52:00 GMT

In what is being viewed as a direct hit to private third-party lenders in the Federal Family Education Loan Program who are fighting to keep the program alive, the U.S. Department of Education’s preliminary data paints the FFEL program as a costly and ineffective system with a 7.3-percent student loan default rate, two whole points higher than the default rate for the Direct Loan Program (“Private Lenders Brace for Fight Over Student-Loan Role,” The Wall Street Journal, March 27, 2009).

Since its launch in the 1960s, FFELP has been the primary source of federal student loans. This year the FFEL program has already lent more than $56 billion in student loans, while the Direct Loan Program has lent just $20 billion. But President Obama has proposed axing the FFEL program, which costs the federal government billions of dollars in subsidies each year, in favor of the government’s Direct Loan Program, through which families borrow directly from the government.

FFELP lenders have said that the Education Department’s untimely release of the student loan default rate data — taken from fiscal year 2007 — was purely political since the government has never released preliminary default rate data and has never broken down the data by the two programs. Industry analysts say the data reflects the differences in the two programs: FFELP lenders typically cater to more students from for-profit schools who tend to default at a higher rate than students in the Direct Loan Program.

Department of Education officials have said they released the data in response to a U.S. Freedom of Information Act request from The Wall Street Journal and inquiries from Congressional leaders.

“It’s unfortunate the rates are being released before there is an analysis of them,” said Brett Lief, president of the National Council of Higher Education Loan Programs, a trade group that represents FFELP lenders and federal loan guarantee agencies. “This is very serious stuff and I’m saddened that it has come out like this.”

No Cut-and-Dry Solution to the FFELP Dilemma

While the Consumer Bankers Association, which represents certain FFELP lenders, has sent Congress a 2,500-signature petition asking legislators to reject the president’s proposal to eliminate the FFEL program, industry observers don’t see the battle over FFELP ending quickly or simply.

The Congressional Budget Office has said eliminating the program would save the government nearly $100 billion over the next 10 years, which President Obama plans to redirect to the Federal Pell Grant program. This potential funding boost for Pell Grants, which are awarded to the nation’s neediest students, could make it harder for legislators who support FFELP to successfully argue to keep the program alive.

However, some legislators who oppose the FFEL program face strong opposition from their home-state guarantee agencies that work with FFELP lenders to service college loans for students in their state. Legislators may also have to battle student loan giant Sallie Mae, which has said that keeping certain elements of FFELP might actually make it possible for the government to draw additional Pell Grant funding from FFELP itself. Sallie Mae has also pointed out that its borrowers, who partake in default prevention programs through state loan-guarantee agencies, are 30 percent less likely to default than direct loan borrowers.

“It’s certainly possible Congress would eliminate the program,” said Terry Hartle, a senior vice president of the American Council of Education, a trade group representing colleges and universities. “But it’s equally possible — and perhaps more so — to wring more savings out of the [FFEL] program and put the savings into Pell.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Univ. of Phoenix Accused of Manipulating Its Default Rate

Student Loan Girl — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:39:00 GMT

Three former University of Phoenix students are suing the for-profit higher education giant for using a questionable loan repayment practice that skews the university’s default rate and takes away federal student loan repayment options from students who withdraw from the school, according to The Chronicle of Higher Education (“Lawsuit Accuses U. of Phoenix of Protecting Its Default Rate at Students’ Expense,” Jan. 14, 2009).

The lawsuit, which could soon reach class-action status, alleges that the university’s ”payback” policy is designed to manipulate the school’s default rate — the percentage of a school’s students who stop repaying their loans. Under the current policy, the school “pays off” students’ federal college loans without students’ knowledge or consent after they have withdrawn from the institution. The University of Phoenix then attempts to improperly collect on the paid-off loans directly from the students “under terms more onerous than those of the original federally guaranteed loans.”

By canceling the federal student loan debt of students who withdraw from the school, the University of Phoenix, which has one of the lowest default rates among the nation’s for-profit colleges, effectively prevents those loans from being considered in its default rate.

Statistics suggest that students who withdraw from school are more likely to default on their student loans, and the more borrowers a school has who go into default thereby increasing its default rate, the more likely the school is to lose its ability to participate in the federal student loan program, among other restrictions.

Students Lose Repayment Benefits Under ‘Payback’ Policy

According to the lawsuit, the university’s payback policy harms students by preventing them from being able to take advantage of generous loan repayment terms offered by the federal student loan program, which include below-market interest rates and longer repayment terms and grace periods.

Students who must repay the University of Phoenix directly are “routinely bombarded with calls, letters, and e-mails from [the university] to collect tuition along with threats that refusal to pay will result in referral to collection agencies and negative reports on their credit.”

The lawsuit seeks actual and punitive damages on behalf of thousands of borrowers affected by the university’s repayment practice over the past four years, as well as an injunction barring the university from continuing its current payback practice, which could affect numerous other for-profit colleges that use similar practices, the Chronicle reports.

In a statement, the University of Phoenix said that the students bringing the lawsuit have “misconstrued” the Higher Education Act, and that the U.S. Department of Education had determined in January 2008 that the school’s refund policies were compliant with federal student aid rules.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Student Loan Default Rates In Nevada Rank Among Top In Nation

Student Loan Girl — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:55:00 GMT

After ranking number one in the nation for student loan defaults for the last four years, Nevada managed to come in fifth this year with a 7.4-percent default rate based on the Education Department’s data for borrowers who began repaying their loans between October 2005, and September 2006.

To combat the state’s consistently high default rate, state colleges have spent the last six years reaching out to Nevada’s federal student loan borrowers who are late on their payments before they default on their loans, said Sharon Wurm, director of financial aid for Nevada’s public college system (“Nevada’s Rate of Default on College Loans Among Highest In The Nation,” Las Vegas Sun, Nov. 30, 2008).

Because Wurm has found that students feel more comfortable discussing their student loan repayment options with their school than with their lender, her office now contacts borrowers by email, ground mail, and telephone to discuss ways students can avert default, such as economic hardship deferments and forbearances. These options allow students to temporarily stop making payments or make reduced payments on their loans.

“[Nevada’s recent ranking] validates all the hard work that the institutions are doing,” Wurm said.

State Lacks Student Loan Default Demographic Data

While Nevada’s outreach initiative may be helping to improve the state’s default rate, Wurm said the state has limited data on the types of students that typically default and the reasons why so many college students continue to default.

One reason, Wurm suspects, may be the state’s low graduation rate. Currently, just 13 percent of Nevada students graduate from the public college system.

In general, students who attend two-year colleges or for-profit schools that offer certificates tend to have higher default rates because they more frequently drop out of school and typically graduate with lower earning potential than students who graduate from four-year institutions.

At the Las Vegas campus of Kaplan College, a for-profit institute offering one-year programs for medical insurance coding and billing 90 percent of students take out student loans, but about 60 percent of students drop out before graduation and 18.9 percent default on their loans.

The College of Southern Nevada, which only has a 4-percent default rate, has been working to improve its retention rate by contacting students when spotty attendance — one of the most common reasons why students do poorly in their classes — first starts to become a problem. The school’s program directors attempt to contact students by phone, ground mail, or via text message, which has helped absenteeism at the school drop by 13 percent since July 2007.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit