Student Loan Blog : federal student loans

Wyoming’s Largest Student Lender to Stop Making Student Loans

Student Loan Girl — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:02:00 GMT

Nonprofit Wyoming Student Loan Corp., the state’s largest student loan lender, has announced that, as of April 1, 2010, it will no longer be issuing any new parent or student loans.

In a statement from president and CEO Phil Van Horn, the company, also known as WyoLoan, said that it will continue to fund any student loans that are already approved for the current 2009–10 academic year and for which all loan proceeds will disburse by March 31, 2010 (WyoLoan announcement of student loan suspension, Oct. 20, 2009).

“WyoLoan is making this announcement at this time so that any student who has applied or who may apply for a loan and for which funds would be released after March 31, 2010, can make other arrangements through their respective school financial aid offices,” the statement reads. “At the present time, we estimate the number of students who will have to resubmit applications to be less than two dozen.”

The company will also continue servicing its current 25,000 customers who already hold student loans, which total $350 million, The Associated Press reported (“WyoLoan to Stop Making Student Loans,” Oct. 30, 2009).

In the lender’s 30-year history, the company website says, WyoLoan has issued over $1 billion in education loans to more than 75,000 students and parents.

Congress Considers the End of the Road for Student Loan Lenders

The company’s decision comes in response to proposed federal legislation moving through Congress that would put an end to the federal student loan program known as FFELP (Federal Family Education Loan Program), which allows private third-party lenders like WyoLoan to issue government-backed student loans.

Currently, the government pays these private FFELP lenders a subsidy for the federal parent and student loans they originate. A second federal student loan program — the Federal Direct Student Loan Program, begun in 1992 — issues federal student loans directly to borrowers through the U.S. Department of Education, with no third-party involvement from a bank or other FFELP lender.

Under the proposed legislation, known as the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act (H.R. 3221), all federal parent and student loans would become Federal Direct loans, issued directly to borrowers through the government rather than through third-party FFELP lenders — effectively putting most private lenders like WyoLoan out of business.

President Obama has been a vocal backer of the SAFRA bill, maintaining that FFELP subsidies funnel government money to banks and away from students. Supporters claim that the elimination of FFELP subsidies will generate $87 billion in savings to taxpayers over the next decade.

Critics, however, dispute this savings figure and say that the legislation amounts to a government takeover of student loans, stripping students of their right to choose their own lender.

Wyoming’s congressional delegation has come out alongside WyoLoan against the SAFRA bill.

The bill was approved by the House of Representatives on Sept. 17 and now awaits a Senate vote.

Should the measure fail to pass, Van Horn said, WyoLoan will consider lifting the suspension of its student loan program.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

‘Gap Loans’ at For-Profit Colleges Escape Proposed Legislation

Student Loan Girl — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:47:00 GMT

While acting last Thursday to approve the creation of a Consumer Financial Protection Agency, which will expand federal oversight of private student loans, a Congressional panel at the same time voted to reject a proposal that would have included school-sponsored “gap loans” under the authority of the new CFPA.

The House Financial Services Committee, in a vote of 39 to 29, approved the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act of 2009 (H.R. 3126), a centerpiece of the Obama administration’s pursuit to overhaul the nation’s financial regulatory system. The approved legislation would create a new federal agency, the CFPA, which would have the authority to write new consumer protection rules in the arenas of lending and credit, including private student loans (“House Panel Moves to Regulate Private Student Loans,” Oct. 26, 2009).

Gap loans, however, could potentially be exempted from the CFPA’s oversight due to language included in the bill meant to shield small businesses and local merchants that extend credit to their customers. A proposed amendment to the CFPA Act that would have clarified that gap loans are subject to CFPA regulation was narrowly defeated in the House committee by a vote of 35 to 33.

Gap Financing on the Rise at For-Profit Schools

“Gap” student loans — so-called because they’re intended to cover students’ financing gaps, any college costs that aren’t covered by a student’s financial aid (scholarships, grants, federal student loans) — are increasingly being offered by for-profit colleges and vocational schools to boost enrollment as these institutions encounter a swelling influx of unemployed and low-income students looking to return to school to obtain a higher-earning degree, learn a new trade, or acquire additional training for their résumé.

“Because the economic meltdown has made it harder for students to get bank loans, several of these schools are increasingly stepping in, financing degrees in the same way a furniture store or used-car dealer might extend credit to customers,” explains Justin Pope, an education writer for The Associated Press (“For-Profit Colleges’ Increased Lending Prompts Concerns,” Aug. 15, 2009).

For-profit schools, also known as “proprietary” colleges, that provide gap financing, which include national heavyweights ITT Technical Institutes, Corinthian Colleges, and Career Education Corp., say that their financing programs allow students to attend school who wouldn’t otherwise be able to afford a college education.

But these gap financing programs are risky and expensive for students, consumer advocates maintain. Gap loans typically carry high interest rates, sometimes in the double digits, and large monthly payments that the schools’ generally low-income students often aren’t able to handle — all while allowing the schools to reap hundreds of thousands of dollars in federal money from the federal financial aid that students use to pay the bulk of their attendance costs.

“I believe we have an obligation to ensure that these schools are not allowed to continue to prey on students,” said Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., who sponsored the defeated CFPA amendment. “By subjecting these schools to CFPA’s authority, the quality of the student loans these schools provide will improve” (“House Panel Approves Expanded Oversight of Private Student Loans,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, Oct. 22, 2009).

Consumer Groups Push for Regulation of Gap Financing

Consumer and student advocate groups, concerned about the potential for student loans made by proprietary schools to be exempted from the CFPA legislation under the bill’s small-business clause, had been lobbying in support of the Waters-sponsored amendment to explicitly bring gap loans under the authority of the CFPA.

“We just want to make sure that the risky financial products that some colleges, for-profits in particular, have been making to students are still covered by this agency, and not undercut by a well-intentioned suggestion of how to make sure that the neighborhood grocer isn’t unfairly and unduly impacted” by increased regulation, said Lauren Asher, president of The Institute for College Access & Success (“Regulating Private Student Loans,” Inside Higher Ed, Oct. 19, 2009).

Asher and TICAS joined a number of other consumer and student advocacy groups in drafting a letter earlier this month to Rep. Barney Frank, the Democratic chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, urging the committee to clarify that school-sponsored loans wouldn’t be shielded from the CFPA’s reach (letter to Rep. Barney Frank regarding H.R. 3126, Oct. 7, 2009).

“To effectively protect consumers, the CFPA must have full authority to regulate private student loans regardless of the institution offering them,” the groups wrote. “For consumers, a private student loan can pose the same serious risks whether issued by a financial institution or by a school. The CFPA should apply and enforce standards based upon the product and not the issuing institution.”

Gap Loans vs. Gap ‘Financing’: The Non–Student Loan

Proprietary colleges argued against the Waters amendment, saying that gap student loans are already regulated by the federal Truth in Lending Act.

New TILA rules, mandated under last year’s Higher Education Opportunity Act (H.R. 4137) and which will go into effect in February, will require student lenders to disclose more details about their private loan programs, including interest rates and estimated monthly payments, and to inform applicants for private student loans about federal student loan options.

Consumer advocates, however, hold that TILA regulations aren’t sufficient and that the stricter oversight of the CFPA is necessary in order to protect student loan borrowers.

In pushing for the Waters amendment, consumer and student advocacy groups pointed to the move being made by some schools to offer their gap funding under the auspices of “consumer financing” rather than as a student loan program. By structuring their gap funding programs as consumer financing rather than as private student loans, schools are able to skirt the student loan–specific requirements, regulations, and borrower disclosures mandated by the Higher Education Opportunity Act.

“It’s very alarming,” said Deanne Loonin, director of student loan borrower assistance project at the National Consumer Law Center. Schools “can structure the products in all kinds of ways — things like revolving credit lines, unsecured loans, even secured loans. It’s this new thing, and we’re worried about it.”

One for-profit school, Colorado-based Westwood College, is currently defending itself against a class-action lawsuit brought by students accusing the school of fraud in its student financing. The lawsuit charges Westwood with violating state banking laws. Westwood’s student financing program carries a relatively high interest rate of 18 percent, but the school doesn’t call its financing student loans.

The For-Profit Risk

Students at proprietary colleges are particularly vulnerable to the schools’ high-interest loans and financing programs, consumer and student groups say, because of who these students are: lower-income, higher-risk borrowers.

Low-income students, who tend to drop out of college in greater numbers than higher-income students, generally end up struggling to repay their student loans. And for-profit colleges, with their student populations that skew toward lower income levels, on average have lower graduation rates and higher loan default rates than other schools.

In 2007–08, students at proprietary colleges defaulted on their student loans at a rate of 11.1 percent, according to the Department of Education, compared to a default rate of 6.0 percent for students at public nonprofit colleges and universities and a rate of 3.8 percent for students at private nonprofit institutions.

Students at for-profit schools are also taking on increasingly higher debt loads: The percentage of proprietary college students borrowing at least $40,000 nearly tripled to 30 percent between 2003–04 and 2007–08, says Mark Kantrowitz, founder of the financial aid website, FinAid.org. The proportion of proprietary college students taking out private student loans has also come near to tripling, rising to 43 percent from 15 percent in that same time period, according to an analysis of federal data by the nonprofit group Education Sector.

Nonetheless, critics charge, as long as proprietary schools can continue to bring in significant federal funds with each student, the schools have little incentive to refine their lending practices to ensure that students aren’t taking on unmanageable debt.

“Consider, for example, a school charging $10,000, hoping to enroll a student who has lined up $9,000 in aid from the government and elsewhere,” writes Pope. “Even if the school loses half of the $1,000 it lends to get the student in the door, it comes out $9,000 ahead.”

And “for many of these students, if you don’t apply these thousand dollars, they’re not coming to school,” says Jeff Silber, an industry analyst with BMO Capital Markets.

From the school’s perspective, you’re realizing “all those other revenues,” he elaborates, “even if you write off $500 [of that $1,000] right away. … Financially it still makes sense to do this.”

And with last week’s defeat of the CFPA amendment, the stage is set for schools to press on with their gap financing programs, having sidestepped, at least for now, the impending shadow of the CFPA and increased federal oversight.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

House Panel Moves to Regulate Private Student Loans

Student Loan Girl — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:23:00 GMT

Voting in support of the creation of a new federal Consumer Financial Protection Agency, a Congressional panel has laid the groundwork for expanded federal oversight of private student loans.

In a vote last Thursday of 39 to 29 that fell largely along party lines, the House Financial Services Committee approved the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act of 2009 (H.R. 3126), a core component of the Obama administration’s pursuit to overhaul the nation’s financial regulatory system.

Agency Would Protect Consumers From ‘Abusive’ Lending Practices

The approved legislation would create a new federal agency, the CFPA, to replace the current patchwork of regulatory bodies and which would have centralized oversight of various forms of consumer credit, such as mortgages and credit cards, as well as nonfederal private student loans.

The agency would have the authority to write new consumer protection rules in the arenas of lending and credit, to monitor banks and other financial institutions for compliance with these rules, and to penalize institutions for any infractions. The CFPA would also have the ability to ban products, marketing tactics, and other business practices that it deems “unfair, deceptive, or abusive.”

“The Consumer Financial Protection Agency will prevent predatory lending practices and other abuses and will ensure that consumers get clear information they can understand about financial products like credit cards and mortgages,” said President Obama, commending the House committee on its vote in support of the bill (“House Panel Backs Creation of Consumer Financial Protection Agency,” Los Angeles Times, Oct. 23, 2009).

The measure passed despite strong Republican opposition and forceful lobbying from banks and business groups.

“It’s not about protecting consumers; it’s about a new government bureaucracy making decisions for us,” said Rep. Spencer Bachus of Alabama, the ranking Republican on the House Financial Services Committee.

Oversight of Private Student Loans Urged

A broad coalition of student and consumer advocacy groups had been urging the House committee to pass this bill that would bring the CFPA’s oversight to the realm of private student loans — non-federally guaranteed education loans issued by banks and private lenders rather than by the Department of Education — that, until this year, had been steadily attracting more and more borrowers as families struggled to meet rising college costs.

“Private student loans are one of the riskiest ways to pay for college, yet a growing number of students have private student loans as well as, or instead of, federal student loans,” the groups wrote in a recent letter to Rep. Barney Frank, the Democratic chairman of the House Financial Services Committee (letter to Rep. Barney Frank regarding H.R. 3126, Oct. 7, 2009).

“Private student loans are expensive, mostly variable-rate loans that cost more for those who can least afford them,” the letter reads. “They lack the fixed rates, consumer protections and flexible repayment options of federal student loans, and are not financial aid any more than a credit card is when used to pay for textbooks or tuition.”

In addition to creating the CFPA, the approved legislation would grant new powers to the states’ attorneys general to assist in enforcing the agency’s rules and to allow them to write more stringent rules for companies within their own states.

The New York attorney general, Andrew Cuomo, who led a nationwide investigation last year into collusion and deceptive practices in the student loan industry, referred to private student loans as “the Wild West of lending” — and not without reason, says Lauren Asher, president of The Institute for College Access & Success, one of the signatories of the letter to Frank (“Bill to Expand Oversight of Private Loans Advances in Congress,” Chronicle of Higher Education, Oct. 19, 2009). “We hope CFPA will bring more law and order,” Asher said.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Cost of College Continues to Climb, Even in a Recession

Student Loan Girl — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:14:00 GMT

Even as the recession has depressed consumer prices and the cost of living has fallen over the last year, college tuition rose in 2009, with the largest percentage increases coming at community colleges and public four-year schools — the mounting expense of an education revealed in the College Board’s latest reports on financial aid and the cost of college, released yesterday (“Trends in Student Aid 2009” and “Trends in College Pricing 2009”).

Squeezed by state budget cuts, public colleges and universities have found themselves forced to raise tuition prices. Tuition and fees at public four-year institutions rose by 6.5 percent for in-state students, to an average of $7,020 in the 2009–10 school year from $6,591 in 2008–09, and by 6.2 percent for out-of-state students, to $18,548 from $17,460.

The rise in community college tuition, to $2,544 this year from $2,372, although only a little shy of $200, represented the sharpest increase percentage-wise, a jump of 7.3 percent.

Costs at private four-year universities also crept upward, although at a slower rate of 4.4 percent, to $26,273 from $25,177.

“Given the financial hardship of the country, it’s simply astonishing that colleges and universities would have this kind of increases,” said Patrick Callan, president of the National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. “It tells you that higher education is still a seller’s market” (“College Costs Keep Rising, Report Says,” The New York Times, Oct. 20, 2009).

Noting that the high school graduating class of 2009 was the largest in history, Callan went on, “Colleges and universities are capitalizing on that more than any other institution in the economy. If you walk around a shopping mall, nobody else is raising prices at the same rate” (“College: More Expensive Than Ever,” CNN Money, Oct. 20, 2009).

The Impact of Financial Aid

Only about a third of students pay these published “sticker” prices, however, underscored Sandy Baum, a senior policy analyst for the College Board and author of the two reports. Most students’ actual out-of-pocket costs are thousands of dollars lower because they receive some type of financial aid in the form of scholarships, grants, and student loans.

“If you look at net prices students pay, considering the grant aid and tax benefits, students at public two-year institutions are actually paying less, in inflation-adjusted dollars,” Baum pointed out. “Even though the sticker price, adjusting for inflation, is up 20 percent in the past five years, the net price is actually lower than it was five years ago.”

Net prices are also down at both public and private four-year universities.

Student Loans Still on the Rise

This drop in out-of-pocket costs notwithstanding, the gap between families’ available resources and the overall cost of attending college remains on a steady incline. Grant funding hasn’t kept up with the hikes in college costs, leaving students in a position of having to take out ever-larger amounts of money in student loans, particularly in the current economic climate, as more families struggle with unemployment, stagnant wages, and curtailed sources of credit.

“There’s a certain cruelty to a rise in education costs amid an economic slump,” observes Randy James, in a piece for TIME. “It makes the single most effective tool to help the underemployed and jobless out of their rut become all the more unreachable” (“The Incredible Climbing Cost of College,” Oct. 21, 2009).

Total education borrower increased by 5 percent from 2007–08 to 2008–09, the latest year for which student aid data are available. The volume of federal student loans — Stafford loans, Grad PLUS loans, and parent PLUS loans — grew by $14.7 billion last year.

“The level of debt we’re asking people to undertake is unsustainable,” said Callan.

In one bright note for student debt watchdog groups, this surge in federal college loans was accompanied by a sharp decline in nonfederal education loans. Nonfederal private student loans tend to have less flexible repayment terms, typically carry higher interest rates, and are generally more costly than federal student loans.

The volume of private student loans shrunk by half last year, to $11.9 billion.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Overhaul of Student Loan System in the Works

Student Loan Girl — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:30:00 GMT

A bill to overhaul the student loan industry may reach Congress as early as next week; education-committee chairs are working behind the scenes on a piece of legislation that would eliminate the third-party student loan system called the Federal Family Education Loan Program, The Chronicle of Higher Education reports (“Behind the Scenes, a Student-Loan Overhaul Takes Shape,” June 16, 2009).

Although few details have been released about the proposed legislation, lenders and a large number of Congressmen are hoping the FFEL program won’t end up on the chopping block like President Obama has proposed. Already as many as 13 counterproposals to the elimination of FFELP have begun circulating Congress, including a detailed plan from lending giant Sallie Mae.

It’s not likely, however, that the FFEL program will survive this legislative session, some Congressmen say, considering taxpayers could see as much as $94 billion in savings over the next 10 years if FFELP were eliminated, according to estimates from the Congressional Budget Office.

Obama had originally suggested that these savings, which have been readjusted down to $87 billion, could be used to increase Pell Grants award amounts each year at a rate equal to the Consumer Price Index. It now looks like Congress will, instead, propose that the money be infused into the Pell Grant program to allow appropriators to “continue to set the maximum [Pell Grant] award” so as not to end up capping the maximum award amount.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

FAFSA Discourages Students From Applying for Federal Loans

Student Loan Girl — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:10:00 GMT

A large proportion of students who only take out non-federal private student loans to finance their education aren’t applying for federal financial aid at all, and it’s the application itself that may be culprit, a new study suggests (“Nightmare Application May Be Driving Students to Costly Loans,” Forbes, June 9, 2009).

In his study of 250,000 students, Mark Kantrowitz, publisher of FinAid.org, a website that offers information on financial aid and student loans, found that since 1999, among those students who relied exclusively on private student loans, 60 percent of undergraduates and nearly 90 percent of graduate students didn’t complete the FAFSA, the Free Application for Federal Student Aid.

The number of students who only take out private student loans has increased 27 percent over the last 10 years. Between 2007 and 2008, the private loans taken out by students who forwent their federal financial aid options amounted to $6.2 billion — nearly 30 percent of the $22.5 billion in new private student loans originated that year.

Proposed Changes Would Eliminate FAFSA

The study’s findings come at a pivotal time in the FAFSA’s history, as the U.S. Department of Education weighs two proposals to overhaul the federal financial aid application process, one of which would carry out President Obama’s campaign promise to eliminate the FAFSA completely.

The FAFSA — currently the only way for families to apply for federal financial aid for college and graduate school — advertises itself as requiring only one hour to complete. But the six-page application calls for families to provide information about their adjusted gross income, marital status, value of their personal property, and taxable income — hurdles, Kantrowitz says, that “may deter students from applying for federal aid.”

A revamp of the FAFSA or of the application process itself could encourage more students to apply for federal student loans, which are typically less costly than private student loans, generally offering lower, fixed interest rates and more flexible repayment terms.

One proposal being considered would simplify the financial aid application form to require only adjusted gross income figures and tax exemption numbers. The other plan that’s been suggested would eliminate an application form altogether and allow the Internal Revenue Service to pass on information from financial aid applicants’ tax returns directly to the Department of Education.

Kantrowitz says a change in the financial aid application process may, in particular, help students from low-income families. His study found that low-income students have been more likely to end up turning to private student loans, which will generally cost them more than federal college loans would: Students from families who earn less than $50,000 a year accounted for two-thirds of those borrowers who financed their education solely with private loans.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Private Student Loans: Proceed With Caution

Student Loan Girl — Mon, 04 May 2009 21:07:00 GMT

Although the government has taken steps to bolster the federal student loan program by expanding Pell Grant awards and raising the maximum award amount of federal Stafford student loans, federal financial aid will still not be enough for many families to pay for college this year.

Grappling with stock market losses that have negatively affected 529 college savings plans and with declining home values that have essentially made home equity loans nonexistent, families of college students will likely have to rely more on private student loans, in addition to federal aid, this year to help pay for their education expenses, reports The New York Times (“Students’ First Lesson: Beware Loans’ Fine Print", May 2, 2009).

But the Times warns that private student loan borrowers need to be particularly cautious when applying for loans.

Private student loan lenders can set their own loan terms and aren’t required to inform their borrowers of the loans rates, fees, and terms. Citing data compiled by Student Lending Analytics, a company that helps schools analyze lending programs, the Times advises families applying for private student loans to weigh their options carefully and to take a close look at the fine print.

Interest Rates Vary From Lender to Lender

Unlike federal student loans, which have fixed interest rates, private student loans carry an average interest rate of 11 percent, according to Student Lending Analytics. However, lenders charge interest rates higher than 11 percent and, in some cases, won’t disclose the interest rate a borrower will be charged until after a borrower signs a promissory note.

Banks offer fixed-rate loans ranging from 7 percent to 12 percent, with big banks charging the highest rates. But at times, banks — particularly JPMorgan Chase, PNC Financial, and SunTrust Bank — hike up the rates on these loans by two to three percentage points if a borrower misses just one loan payment.

The variable-rate loans that private lenders offer can be tied to a specified interest rate index, like the prime rate, and their rates can vary depending on the changes to rate index. Chase, for example, charges interest as high as 13.5 percent on these loans.

Lenders Should Disclose All Fees

Tim Ranzetta, the founder of Student Lending Analytics, says lenders should be required to disclose any adjustments they make to an interest rate when a borrower misses a payment or when any other negative activity takes place on a borrower’s account.

Currently, lenders don’t disclose all the possible fees borrowers may be charged in the servicing and collection of their student loans, and lenders’ loan contracts don’t always inform borrowers of the borrower benefits promised in the lender advertisements, including the possibility of a borrower being charged a lower interest rate after graduation.

Ranzetta says, in addition to demanding that lenders fully disclose their loan terms, lenders should also be required to list their advertised benefits in the promissory note in order to contractually obligate lenders to offer their benefits.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

College Board Pushes Obama to Grant Financial Aid to Undocumented Immigrants

Student Loan Girl — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:10:00 GMT

The College Board — an organization of some 5,000 colleges best known for its college admission tests — has petitioned Congress to allow students who are undocumented immigrants to qualify for tuition aid and citizenship, The Associated Press reports (“U.S. Colleges Push Tuition Aid for Immigrants,” April 21, 2009).

While undocumented immigrants are legally entitled to a K-12 public education, the issue of granting undocumented immigrants the same college access given to American citizens has proven controversial. As the immigration debate has intensified, several states have moved to bar undocumented immigrants from paying in-state tuition, and in some cases, from enrolling in their public colleges.

Citing data from its recently-released report, which found that states that offer financial aid to undocumented immigrants have generally increased their college revenue, not lessened it, the College Board says federal legislation is needed to nationally extend in-state tuition rates to all undocumented students.

“This is a new area for us, but it was an easy call,” said Thomas Rudin, senior vice president of the College Board. Rudin says it's contradictory that the same undocumented immigrants who receive a K-12 public education suddenly encounter obstacles when applying to college, even those who are “honor-roll students, athletes, class presidents, and valedictorians.”

“We absolutely believe it’s important for opening up economic opportunities,” Rudin said.

Federal Stance Unclear: States Set Own Agenda

Although the Supreme Court ruled in 1982 that undocumented immigrants may obtain a K–12 education, the federal law remains silent on what higher education benefits they’re entitled to, leaving it up to the discretion of individual states.

Nine states offer in-state tuition to undocumented immigrants, while other states including Arizona, Georgia, Colorado, and Oklahoma have adopted legislation barring undocumented immigrants from paying in-state tuition rates, the Associated Press reports. Other states such as South Carolina bar undocumented immigrants from even enrolling in any of their public colleges.

President Obama is expected to address the issue of immigration reform later this year. In particular, Obama will look at the Dream Act, legislation first proposed in 2001, that would grant conditional legal status to undocumented immigrants who have lived in the U.S. for five years and who have graduated from high school. These students would then be eligible for in-state tuition and federal financial aid, including Pell Grants and federal student loans.

While critics contend that such immigration reform would eliminate jobs and reduce college enrollment slots, the College Board’s findings reveal that immigration reform would help to stimulate the economy, since a college education would help undocumented students to obtain better jobs and higher incomes than they would have received with only a high school education. The boost to the economy would show up in the form of increased tax revenue and consumer spending, the organization stated.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Students Increasingly Choosing Private Student Loans

Student Loan Girl — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:39:00 GMT

According to analysis of Department of Education data released last week, the number of college students taking out private student loans over the last five years has risen sharply. Analysis by student advocacy group The Project on Student Debt revealed that the percentage of all undergraduates who took out private student loans last school year jumped to 14 percent from 5 percent during the 2003–04 academic year (“New Data Show Big Increases in Private Student Loan Borrowing,” The Project on Student Debt press release, April 21, 2009).

The data showed that students attending schools that charge more than $10,000 in tuition and fees were more likely to use private student loans than were students attending less costly institutions. In fact, these for-profit colleges and universities saw the percentage of students who took out private student loan skyrocket to 42 percent last year compared to 13 percent five years ago.

The Project on Student Debt also found that slightly more than a quarter of private student loan borrowers didn’t take out federal student loans: 14 percent didn’t even apply for federal financial aid, and 12 percent filled out the Free Application for Federal Student Aid but chose not to take out a federal Stafford student loan.

These federal student loan statistics are particularly concerning, said Laura Asher, acting president of the Institute for College Access & Success, which runs The Project on Student Debt, because federal loans are available to nearly all students, regardless of their income, and because federal loans tend to have more favorable interest rates and repayment terms than private student loans.

“Too many students,” Asher said, “are missing out on federal loans and going straight to one of the riskiest borrowing options.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Student Loan Default Rate On the Rise

Student Loan Girl — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:02:00 GMT

Weighed down by job losses, limited job availability, and lower salary wages, college graduates — who leave school owing an average of $22,500 in student loans — are defaulting on their federal student loans at the highest rate since 1998 (“In Grim Job Market, Student Loans Are a Costly Burden,” The New York Times, April 18, 2009).

“When it comes down to making your student loan payment or buying gas to go to work, it isn’t a difficult decision to make sometimes,” said David Clark of College Assist, a national guarantee agency that helps its borrowers stay current on their college loans (“Student-Loan Debtors Get Breaks,” The Denver Post, April 12, 2009).

Student loan borrowers who fail to pay on their federal student loans could have 15 percent of their wages garnished, could lose their state and federal tax refunds, and could lose a portion of their Social Security benefits. And many borrowers have learned that, unlike other types of unsecured loans, student loans typically cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy filing.

But borrowers may be able to avoid taking the drastic step of filing for bankruptcy or avoid having the government seize their money by working out a repayment resolution with their lenders, Clark said.

“Once we can get someone on the phone, we have a 90 percent rate of curing an account and keeping it out of default,” he said.

Federal Student Loan Repayment Options

Deferment or Forbearance. Borrowers can postpone their student loan payments for three years if they become unemployed or if they provide proof of economic hardship. In deferment the government pays the interest on borrowers’ subsidized federal loans, but in forbearance borrowers are responsible for any interest that accrues on all of their federal student loans.

“Students may not fully appreciate just how much [deferment or forbearance] increases the size of the loans,” said Mark Kantrowitz, publisher of the financial aid website FinAid.org. “That’s why deferments and forbearances should mainly be used as a method to solve a temporary problem.”

Extend the terms. Graduates can extend the terms of their loans, thereby lowering their monthly payments, although in doing so they could ultimately pay double the interest what they would have originally paid. Graduates can switch back to their original loan terms at any time.

Income-based repayment. Beginning this July, eligible federal student loan borrowers can enroll in an income-based repayment plan that will limit their monthly loan payments to 15 percent of their discretionary income — income that is above 150 percent of the poverty line — and that will forgive borrowers’ remaining loan balances after 25 years of repayment.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

The Plot Thickens for the Future of Student Lending

Student Loan Girl — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:00:00 GMT

It’s “all hands on deck” for federal student loan lenders. The banks and third-party student loan providers that make up the Federal Family Education Loan Program have made it abundantly clear that they’re not going to roll over and accept the terms of the Obama administration’s proposal to axe their loan program in favor of the Education Department’s Direct Loan Program without a fight, The New York Times reports (“Plan to Change Student Lending Sets Up a Fight,” April 12, 2009)

“We can either meet or beat the budget savings that are in the president’s budget with the exact same system that we have got working now with maybe a few tweaks,” said Albert Lord, chief executive of Sallie Mae, the largest student loan provider participating in the FFEL program.

According to Congressional Budget Office calculations, establishing the Direct Loan Program as the sole provider of federal student loans is projected to save the government $94 billion over the next 10 years, savings that President Obama has said would be funneled directly into the federal Pell Grant Program for low-income students.

Lender-Proposed Alternatives Come Up Short

Lord and other FFELP lenders who oppose the administration’s plan are pushing for a compromise between the Obama plan and the current system that would allow them to continue offering students valuable lending services — quality customer relations, billing, and default prevention and collection — and still achieve Obama’s goal of saving taxpayers money.

FFELP lenders say such dually-beneficial partnerships are possible, which can be evidenced by a compromise that Congress approved last year that allows FFELP lenders to originate student loans using federal money and to resell the loans back to the government. FFELP lenders, which provide more than $56 billion of the nation’s federal student loans, were able to continue making loans to families and the government was able to ensure that families still had access to federal student loans.

But the savings Sallie Mae projects under its compromise plan still only add up to about 82 percent of the president’s savings goal over the next five years.

Supporters of the president’s plan say that this savings shortfall, as well as the fact that FFELP lenders are still relying on the government’s help to retain lending capital, raises the question, “why do we even need private lenders,” asked Representative Timothy Bishop, D–N.Y., a former provost of Southampton College.

Bishop argues that expanding the Direct Loan Program, which provides federal student loan funds directly to more than 1,500 schools is “obvious and long overdue,” being that over the last few decades private lenders have earned huge profits at relatively no risk because the government guarantees repayment up to 97 percent.

Factional In-Fighting Could Favor Lenders

In addition to battling lenders, lawmakers are also fighting an internal battle. Republicans say Obama’s plan is just another means to expand government control over the private sector, while Democrats are divided, with some legislators favoring the plan while others, who represent districts that rely heavily on student loan providers for employment, are siding with private lenders.

Allen Boyd, D–Fla., argues that the president’s proposal could jeopardize thousands of jobs across the country, including 650 in his own district, at a time when unemployment is already rampant. And the states that administer loans through state-based guarantee agencies, considered quasi-government entities that benefit the same as private lenders, are fighting to retain their lending business.

To help keep these quasi-government agencies afloat if they lose their FFELP business, the Obama administration has proposed spending $500 million a year on these agencies’ financial literacy programs and services.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Federal Student Loan Lenders Fight for Survival

Student Loan Girl — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:52:00 GMT

In what is being viewed as a direct hit to private third-party lenders in the Federal Family Education Loan Program who are fighting to keep the program alive, the U.S. Department of Education’s preliminary data paints the FFEL program as a costly and ineffective system with a 7.3-percent student loan default rate, two whole points higher than the default rate for the Direct Loan Program (“Private Lenders Brace for Fight Over Student-Loan Role,” The Wall Street Journal, March 27, 2009).

Since its launch in the 1960s, FFELP has been the primary source of federal student loans. This year the FFEL program has already lent more than $56 billion in student loans, while the Direct Loan Program has lent just $20 billion. But President Obama has proposed axing the FFEL program, which costs the federal government billions of dollars in subsidies each year, in favor of the government’s Direct Loan Program, through which families borrow directly from the government.

FFELP lenders have said that the Education Department’s untimely release of the student loan default rate data — taken from fiscal year 2007 — was purely political since the government has never released preliminary default rate data and has never broken down the data by the two programs. Industry analysts say the data reflects the differences in the two programs: FFELP lenders typically cater to more students from for-profit schools who tend to default at a higher rate than students in the Direct Loan Program.

Department of Education officials have said they released the data in response to a U.S. Freedom of Information Act request from The Wall Street Journal and inquiries from Congressional leaders.

“It’s unfortunate the rates are being released before there is an analysis of them,” said Brett Lief, president of the National Council of Higher Education Loan Programs, a trade group that represents FFELP lenders and federal loan guarantee agencies. “This is very serious stuff and I’m saddened that it has come out like this.”

No Cut-and-Dry Solution to the FFELP Dilemma

While the Consumer Bankers Association, which represents certain FFELP lenders, has sent Congress a 2,500-signature petition asking legislators to reject the president’s proposal to eliminate the FFEL program, industry observers don’t see the battle over FFELP ending quickly or simply.

The Congressional Budget Office has said eliminating the program would save the government nearly $100 billion over the next 10 years, which President Obama plans to redirect to the Federal Pell Grant program. This potential funding boost for Pell Grants, which are awarded to the nation’s neediest students, could make it harder for legislators who support FFELP to successfully argue to keep the program alive.

However, some legislators who oppose the FFEL program face strong opposition from their home-state guarantee agencies that work with FFELP lenders to service college loans for students in their state. Legislators may also have to battle student loan giant Sallie Mae, which has said that keeping certain elements of FFELP might actually make it possible for the government to draw additional Pell Grant funding from FFELP itself. Sallie Mae has also pointed out that its borrowers, who partake in default prevention programs through state loan-guarantee agencies, are 30 percent less likely to default than direct loan borrowers.

“It’s certainly possible Congress would eliminate the program,” said Terry Hartle, a senior vice president of the American Council of Education, a trade group representing colleges and universities. “But it’s equally possible — and perhaps more so — to wring more savings out of the [FFEL] program and put the savings into Pell.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Groups Say Forgiving Student Loan Debt Would Boost Economy

Student Loan Girl — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:16:00 GMT

As student loan debt continues to rise — jumping to $20,098 per graduating student loan borrower in 2007 from $18,796 in 2006 — and employment prospects continue to worsen, college graduates are experiencing greater difficulty repaying their student loans, and some of them have said enough is enough, BusinessWeek reports ("Asking for Student Loan Forgiveness,” March 24, 2009).

In 2008, borrowers fell behind on nearly $131 billion in private student loan payments, according to FinAid.org. There were $544 billion in federal student loans left outstanding for the fiscal year 2009, up from $502 billion in 2008, the U.S. Department of Education reports.

Student Borrowers Use Facebook to Advocate A Break From Loans

While Robert Applebaum hasn’t fallen behind on his student loan payments from law school, he has become frustrated with his mounting student loan debt. The New York attorney saw his $80,000 student loan debt balloon to $100,000 after he put his loans into forbearance for five years when he was working a low-paying job at the Brooklyn District Attorney’s Office.

Fed up with his rising debt and with recent media reports of banking executives from bailed-out banks receiving hefty bonuses or spending taxpayer money on million-dollar office renovations, Applebaum took his gripes online. He used Facebook as a soapbox to promote his own idea for stimulating the economy: canceling student loan debt. He quickly found out he wasn’t the only one interested in this idea.

Within the first two weeks of starting the Facebook group “Cancel Student Loan Debt to Stimulate the Economy,” Applebaum gained 2,500 followers. Just two months later, the group now has more than 138,500 members.

“Despite having a law degree, I’m middle class and I don’t have any money at all,” Applebaum says. “I don’t own a house or a car. My only assets are my couch and television.”

More Change Needed But Reforms Are Taking Shape

Applebaum hasn’t been the only one to take to the Internet to advocate for student loan forgiveness. Alan Collinge, founder of the website StudentLoanJustice.org, has used his site as well as in-person visits with elected officials throughout the country to increase awareness about the problems in the student loan system. Collinge has advocated for a return of what he calls “basic consumer rights” to student loan borrowers. Currently, student loans are one of a few types of consumer debts that are almost impossible to discharge in bankruptcy proceedings.

“Until someone shows me why student loans should specifically be exempt from bankruptcy protections, it’s definitely a fight worth fighting,” Collinge said.

Although it may be some time before the government agrees to forgive student loan debt, legislators have taken steps to make student loan payments more affordable.

On July 1 of this year, the government will implement the Income-Based Repayment plan, which caps borrowers’ monthly student loan payments at 10 percent of their gross income for 25 years, after which borrowers’ remaining debt will be forgiven. And the government’s Public Service Loan Forgiveness program allows borrowers to make income-based repayments on their student loans and have those loans discharged after 10 years of working in public service.

NextStudent, college, college loans, student loans, student loan forgiveness, discharge student loans, student loan debt, college graduates, graduate debt, BusinessWeek, Facebook groups, private student loanns, federal student loans, Finaid.org, U.S. Department of Education, Educaiton Department, Robert Applebaum, Brooklyn District Attorney's Office, cancel student loan debt, canceling student loan debt. Alan Colinge, student loan justice, student loan system, student loan borrowers, bankrupcty debt discharges, affordable student loan payments, student loan legislation, income based repayment plans, public services loan forgiveness

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Despite Down Economy, College Student Aid Still Thriving

Student Loan Girl — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:18:00 GMT

In economic downturns, colleges and universities become flooded with students of all ages looking to better prepare themselves for an increasingly competitive job market. But these schools haven’t been immune to the effects of today’s recession.

Fortunately, for every recent economic downturn in higher education — tuition hikes, state budget cuts, scholarship and grant cutbacks, and a fluctuating student loan market — there’s also been a tangible upside (“Glimmer of Hope for Student Aid in a Bad Economy,” USA Today, March 19, 2009).

Tuition Assistance

Downside: Public colleges have increased tuition by 4 percent per year over the past 10 years, and many schools are set to bump up tuition even more this year as they face unprecedented state budget cuts.

Upside: Federal stimulus money should help some public colleges to better cope with the loss of state funding and to minimize any increases in tuition. The state of Maryland is hoping to go a fourth-straight year without in-state tuition increases. Other colleges are offering one-time deals to students; Kent State University in Ohio is offering laid-off workers a one-time tuition and application waiver at its Trumbull campus, and Manchester College in Georgia is offering to refund one year of tuition for students who aren’t able to secure a job or admission to grad school within six months after graduation.

Institutional Aid

Downside: Trouble in the stock market has caused colleges’ endowments to drop 25 percent in value this year, which has severely hampered schools’ ability to offer scholarships.

Upside: Despite their endowment losses, more than 90 percent of the nation’s private colleges and universities will be increasing financial aid next year by 9.8 percent to make up for 4-percent tuition increases, according to the National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities.

Government Grants

Downside: Aid for merit scholarships has taken one of the biggest hits this year, primarily due to state budget cuts.

Upside: The federal stimulus package has increased the maximum award for Pell Grants — federal financial aid for low-income students — from $4,731 to $5,350 for the coming academic year and to $5,500 for the 2010–2011 academic year. And, an additional 800,000 students are expected to receive Pell Grant funding this year.

Federal Student Loan Programs

Downside: The $50 billion Federal Family Education Loan Program — the government program that provides federal student loans to more than 10 million students through third-party lenders — has been the larger of the two federal student loan programs. But over the past two years, the FFEL program has lost business to the Direct Loan Program, the government’s other federal student loan program through which the U.S. Department of Education provides federal student loans directly to families, as hundreds of cash-strapped FFELP lenders have been forced to exit the program.

Upside: The FFEL program has still managed to increase its student loan volume this year, and some lenders are returning to the student loan market now that the federal government has bought nearly $25 billion in lenders’ student loan securities, providing them with the capital to make new loans. The Direct Loan Program has picked up the slack, providing an additional $7 billion in lending this year.

Private Student Loans

Downside: The overall supply of capital for private student loans is estimated to have decreased by one-third — a decrease of between $6 billion and $7 billion — due in large part to the fact that lenders have made it harder for families to qualify for private student loans.

Upside: Increased government funding for federal Stafford student loans has helped to reduce students’ reliance on private student loans. And more students are maxing out their federal financial aid before turning to private student loans, which the USA Today suggests has helped students avoid over-borrowing in private student loans.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

More Schools Offering Direct Student Loans

Student Loan Girl — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:25:00 GMT

The direct student loan program — which President Obama wants to establish as the sole provider of federal student loans by 2010 — is swiftly gaining ground on the Federal Family Education Loan Program.

In the past year, the number of college and universities originating loans through the Direct Loan Program has increased by more than 50 percent, reports USA Today (“Government’s Direct Student Loan Program Gets a Boost,” March 10, 2009). More than 1,600 schools are offering direct loans, up from 548 schools in 2007, according to the Department of Education, while the number of schools offering FFELP loans fell by 3.6 percent during the same time period.

Currently, students are able to get federal student loans from one of two government programs: the Federal Family Education Loan Program, through which students borrow money from private third- party lenders that are subsidized by the government, or the Direct Loan Program, through which families borrow money directly from the Department of Education.

Direct Loan Program: The Future of Federal Student Loans

However, President Obama recently announced a plan that would eliminate the proven 44-year-old FFEL program, which is responsible for making three out of every four federal student loans. The move would transform the Direct Loan Program from a minority player in the student loan industry to the nation’s only originator of federal student loans.

The president’s plan could reduce the government’s student loan costs and save the government $4 billion, Obama administration officials suggest.

Critics of the president’s proposal — which include private student loan lenders — contest the government’s $4 billion savings estimate and fear that the Department of Education won’t be able to handle the surge in loan volume that would occur if the Direct Lending Program became the only originator of federal student loans. Families could be forced to endure poor customer service from an overburdened system, and could encounter difficulties in getting the funds they need for school, critics say.

Besides excellent customer service and a long-running track record of success, private lenders have another advantage over direct lending, says Barry Feierstein, executive vice president of Sallie Mae.

“Private lender and loan guarantors have a system to help borrowers avoid defaulting on their loans,” he says. “That level of outreach doesn't exist in the federal direct loan program.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit