Student Loan Blog : education secretary

Students Could Wave Goodbye to Merit–Based Federal Aid

Student Loan Girl — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:41:00 GMT

In another move to restructure the federal financial aid system, President Obama has proposed ending the government’s five-year foray into merit-based student aid and redirecting those financial aid funds to the need-based Pell Grant program, reports The Chronicle of Higher Education (“An Experiment in Merit-Based Student Aid Is Likely to End,” June 26, 2009).

The Academic Competitiveness Grant and the National Science and Mathematics Access to Retain Talent Grant programs were created by Congress in 2006 to encourage students to take academically “rigorous” coursework in high school and then choose college majors in fields with labor shortages.

Only students who are eligible for need-based Pell Grants can qualify for the Academic Competitiveness Grants, which provide $750 and $1,300 to college freshmen and sophomores respectively, and for the SMART grants, which provide $4,000 to college juniors and seniors who major in science, math, and certain foreign languages.

But so far both grant programs have fallen short of their participation projections, due in large part to the Department of Education’s failure to promote the programs, as reported by the department’s own inspector general in 2008.

The other major problem has been the programs’ vague qualification criteria, which has made it difficult for financial aid officers’ to determine award recipients. The American Council on Education, in a 2006 letter to the Department of Education, called the grant program’s guidelines “unworkable” and defined them as placing a “breathtaking administrative burden” on colleges’ financial aid officers.

Obama’s Proposal Receives Support From Education Officials

Education Department officials support the president’s proposal to make the Pell program an entitlement with annual increases tied to inflation and to raise the maximum Pell awards by $200 to $5,500 by the 2010–11 academic year because, they say, the Pell Grant program better serves low-income students than the competitiveness grant programs.

This proposal “would benefit the vast majority of the nearly six million Pell Grant recipients worldwide,” even though the annual increases amount to significantly less funding for the one in 10 students who qualify for the Academic Competitiveness and SMART grants.

Even former Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings, who crafted the merit-based programs under the Bush administration, backs the proposal.

“Do higher education officials and K-12 officials prefer free money with no strings attached? Absolutely,” Spellings said. “But if we’re trying to move the needle, putting resources behind our policy goals is a more powerful and prudent way to go."

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Student Loan Lending Still Going Strong

Student Loan Girl — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:34:00 GMT

Despite being hampered last year by a lack of investors and a lack of access to credit, federal student loan lenders are surviving the economic crisis — making the student loan market one of the few lending industries still able to thrive this year, The Wall Street Journal reports (“Tuition Ammunition: a Happy Lesson on Lending,” Jan. 6, 2008).

Proactive and swift action by the federal government, which guaranteed 18.6 percent more student loans for the 2008-09 academic year than the previous year, has helped the student loan industry avoid the decreases in volume seen by the mortgage and banking industries.

In addition to a move by the Treasury Department to infuse tens of billions of dollars into U.S. banks so lenders could issue new student loans, Congress passed legislation that allowed the federal government to buy up student loan securities from cash-strapped lenders.

The Ensuring Continued Access to Student Loans Act (HR 5715) was intended to help student loan lenders, allowing the government to buy loans directly from these lenders, and may have contributed to a 9.4-percent climb in loan originations for the 2008–09 academic year by lenders in the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP). While the legislation has been in place, the government has purchased about $97 million in student loans and invested nearly $10 billion in student loan trusts, figures that are expected to grow before the end of this school year.

“What we’ve seen so far is that programs we have put in place are having the desired effect,” said Education Secretary Margaret Spellings. Although she’s optimistic that the government’s efforts to boost student lending are working, she said she’s not ready to “declare any victories.”

Credit Markets Hinder Private Student Loan Lenders

While federal student loan lenders seem to be riding out the economic storm, observers say it’s unclear whether the private student loan market, which is suffering greatly from the credit crunch, will experience the same success.

After the market for selling bundled student loan securities dried up, the Federal Reserve initiated a $200 billion program in the hopes of encouraging investors to continue buying these securities. Analysts say, however, that these efforts may not be enough for the private student loan industry to compete with the demand for and the availability of low-cost federal student loans.

Last school year, private student loans accounted for about $17.6 billion, just one-fifth of the $85.9 billion in total student loan lending, according to the College Board. This year, lenders and analysts estimate that private student loan lenders have done 25 percent less business.

Already 39 lenders have stopped making private student loans, and others have tightened their lending criteria, both of which may force financially struggling families to pursue more affordable higher education options, said Tim Ranzetta, president of Student Lending Analytics, an independent research and advisory firm. “The cloud of this financing issue,” Ranzetta said, “will push more [students] to state public universities and community colleges.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Student Loan Providers Get More Help From the Government

Student Loan Girl — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:39:00 GMT

In a move intended to avoid a shortfall in student loans next year, Congress has expanded the government program to buy federally guaranteed student loans from private lenders.

Under the updated loan-purchase plan, the Education Department can now buy lenders’ student loans with origination dates between Oct. 1, 2003, and July 1, 2009, The New York Times reports (“U.S. Buying More Loans to Students,” Nov. 8, 2008). The original buyback parameters only allowed lenders to purchase loans made for the current academic year and for the 2009–10 academic year.

Federal officials say that as much as $60 billion in student loans may be eligible for purchase under the new expansion.

“We were able to provide stable, reliable funding for students this school year,” said Education Secretary Margaret Spellings. Now the government is taking action to avoid problems in student loans for next year, she said.

Expanded Program May Solve Liquidity Problem

Many lenders were initially unable to participate in the student loan buyback program because the original version of the program only allowed lenders to sell loans on the secondary market that were generated prior to 2008.

The economic conditions during the current academic year have made it difficult for lenders to secure the financing needed to make new student loans that would be eligible for sale through the buyback program. Unable to sell their loans, lenders were then forced to carry their loans on their books.

“They have these government-guaranteed loans and nobody wants to fund them,” said Sameer Gokhale, a financial analyst for Keefe, Bruyette & Woods in New York. “The government is agreeing to buy more of the loans to give more liquidity.”

The Education Department hopes that the new initiative will provide lenders with the required funds to generate new federal and private loans next year, as lenders may be more likely to participate in the program once they can free up billions of dollars in loans under the new requirements of the buyback program.

“We need to do everything we can to prevent students from becoming the next victims of the financial crisis,” said Sen. Edward Kennedy, chairman of the Senate Education Committee. “Next year, we need to take a closer look at these programs to insulate them from fluctuations in the market so students’ ability to access loans is not threatened.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Justice Department Should Weigh In On Student-Loan Loophole Scandal, Senator Says

Student Loan Girl — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:57:00 GMT

Rep. Thomas Petri, R-Wis., wrote to Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings this week asking whether she plans to involve the Justice Department in the investigation of a federal subsidy loophole that benefited nonprofit student loan providers and may have cost the federal government nearly $1.2 billion (“Republican Lawmaker Presses Spellings on Loan-Loophole Losses,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, Oct. 3, 2008).

“In order to restore integrity to the guaranteed-loan program,” Petri wrote, “it is vital that we understand where abuse has occurred.”

The audit of 14 student loan companies, published last month, found that a loophole in a government subsidy program, which guaranteed a 9.5-percent return on nonprofit lenders’ student loans, may have inadvertently allowed lenders to collect nearly three times the amount of subsidies they would have otherwise been entitled to.

If the actions of these lenders are representative of all student loan companies that participated in the subsidy program, writes Paul Basken of The Chronicle, “it would mean the government lost nearly $1.2 billion in improper payments over a six-year period, or about twice the previous estimates.”

Lenders Allowed to Keep Subsidies, Continue Using Program

The government subsidy program — initiated almost 30 years ago to encourage lenders to offer affordable student loans at a time when interest rates were high — gave nonprofit student loan lenders a guaranteed 9.5 percent rate-of-return on student loans they issued.

In 1993, after interest rates had dropped, Congress eliminated the 9.5-percent interest rate guarantee but grandfathered in all loans that lenders issued at the 9.5 interest rate before the cutoff date. To get around the cutoff, some lenders began “recycling” new loan money through old accounts to make them eligible again for the expired 9.5-percent subsidy rate (“Government Losses on 9.5 Percent Loan Loophole May Exceed $1 Billion,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, Sept. 18, 2008).

The audit’s findings come after Spellings, in January 2007, allowed lenders who had taken advantage of the loophole to keep the disputed subsidy payments they had already received. As part of her settlement offer, she also said that student loan providers who wanted to continue billing the government under the 9.5-percent rate program would have to provide independent audits proving their calculations were not based on the loophole.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Student Loan Providers May Get Government Help for One More Year

Student Loan Girl — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:08:00 GMT

With problems in the credit markets continuing to plague student loan providers, the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly approved a year-long extension of the Ensuring Continued Access to Student Loans Act, which allows the secretary of education to buy student loans from cash-strapped lenders.

If approved by the Senate, the measure, which Congress originally passed last spring, would extend the education secretary’s loan purchasing power through July 1, 2010 to help ensure that students have access to federal student loans for the 2009–10 academic year. The bill was set to expire July 1, 2009.

The act gives the Department of Education the authority to buy student loans from third-party private lenders in the Federal Family Education Loan Program who have been unable to sell their loans to investors following fallout from the subprime mortgage crisis.

“Our rough economy is already dealing a huge blow to American families and we can’t allow trouble in the credit markets to further price students out of a college degree,” said Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., chairman of the Committee on Education and Labor (“House Moves to Protect Student Loans,” Associated Press, Sept. 15, 2008).

“With market conditions showing no signs of letting up,” Miller added, “it’s only prudent to make sure that students have every assurance that the federal student loans they need will be there next year.”

The measure would also extend the secretary’s authority to advance federal funds to guarantee agencies so those agencies can make loans, if necessary, as a “lender of last resort” for the nation’s colleges and universities.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Government’s Direct Lending Program Sees 43-Percent Increase in Volume

Student Loan Girl — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:36:00 GMT

As cash-strapped lenders continue to drop out of the Federal Family Education Loan Program, the number of student loans originated for the 2008–09 school year through the government’s Direct Loan Program has increased by 43 percent, reports The Chronicle of Higher Education (“As ‘Crisis’ Deters Loan Companies, Direct Lending Sees 43-Percent Jump,” Sept. 2, 2008).

Lenders in the FFEL Program — through which borrowers take out federal student loans through private, third-party lenders including banks, state agencies, and nonprofit lenders — have generally accounted for 80 percent of all federal student loan volume, according to the House Committee on Education and Labor (“The College Loan Landscape,” March 2008).

But the Direct Loan Program, which provides loans to students and parents directly from the Department of Education, is gaining ground. As of August 8, the Direct Loan Program had already originated more than $10.84 billion in federal student loans at 1,156 colleges and universities. At this time last year, the direct-lending program, had originated just $7.55 billion in loans at 851 institutions.

And although the exact figures have yet to be released, the Education Department estimates that the Direct Loan Program, which has generally made up 20 percent of all federal college loan volume, will soon be comparable in size to the FFEL program. FFELP lenders have only issued $13 billion in federal student loans at 3,230 colleges and universities this academic year, compared to the $55.8 billion in student loans they originated at 4,612 schools last year.

So Far, A Smooth Transition to Direct Lending

Government subsidy cuts to FFELP lenders enacted by the College Cost Reduction and Access Act last September, as well as continued fallout from the subprime mortgage crisis, have led more than 100 lenders to suspend their participation in the FFEL program.

By April of this year, some 5.8 percent of lenders remaining in the FFEL program had switched over to the direct-lending program and another 19.3 percent said they were considering the switch, according to Student Lending Analytics, a company that provides financial aid administrators with data about lenders (“Drift Toward Direct Lending (Update),” Inside Higher Ed, April 30, 2008).

Although some lenders questioned the Education Department’s ability to handle an increase in loan volume through its Direct Loan Program, some financial aid administrators say the Department of Education has done well in handling the influx of business.

Anna Griswold, executive director of student aid and assistant vice president for undergraduate education at Penn State, says she has been “pretty pleased” with the Direct Loan Program and has not experienced any glitches. Penn State, the 10th-largest FFELP lender last year, became a direct-lending school this year after its FFELP lender, the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, stopped offering federal student loans in February.

Penn State borrowers have already taken out $100 million in student loans this year through the direct-lending program.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Education Department at Fault for Low Participation in Grant Programs, Audit Shows

Student Loan Girl — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:58:00 GMT

In an audit of the Department of Education, the department’s own inspector general blames the lack of participation in the government’s Academic Competitiveness and National Smart Grant programs on his department’s failure to effectively promote the programs, according to an article in The Chronicle of Higher Education (“Education Dept. Blamed for Not Doing Enough to Promote Grants,” August 4, 2008).

Low-income students who completed their state’s rigorous coursework requirements in high school are eligible for Academic Competitive Grants, otherwise known as ACG, during their freshmen and sophomore years of college. Smart Grants are awarded to low-income college juniors and seniors who are taking classes toward the completion of specific majors, including math, engineering, or technology, and maintain a 3.0 GPA.

The audit, released Friday, suggests that the Education Department hasn’t done enough to “follow-up with nonparticipating schools to ensure those [schools] required to participate” in the two programs were doing so, the inspector general said.

Although Congress approved $790 million in grants for the two programs during the 2006–07 academic year and up to $4.5 billion through 2010, the Education Department only awarded $242 million in Academic Competitiveness Grants to 310,000 students, and only $206 million in Smart Grants to 64,000 students.

Secretary Spellings Justifies Programs’ Shortcomings

Last month, Education Secretary Margaret Spellings suggested that the low participation in the grant programs was due to the fact that not enough high schools were teaching courses that meet the academic standards of the program.

While Spellings lays the blame on high schools, the inspector general’s report showed that the department had a list of 640 nonparticipating colleges and universities that were potentially eligible for the ACG program.

More than half of the schools did not respond to the department when it attempted to contact them. In a random sample of 75, or 23 percent, of these 330 nonparticipating schools, however, the report found that more than 83 percent were considered eligible.

And among the 310 schools that did respond to the department’s outreach, administrators at 23 percent of these schools said they didn’t know their schools were eligible. The inspector general found that more than 73 percent of these school were, in fact, eligible for the programs.

To improve participation in the programs, the inspector general recommends that the Education Department do a better job of reaching out to colleges and universities with eligible students. The department should also consider fining schools or taking away their eligibility to participate in the federal Pell Grant program if they have qualified students enrolled but don’t participate in the ACG or the National SMART Grant programs.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Proposed Bill Combines House, Senate Versions of the Higher Education Act

Student Loan Girl — Wed, 14 May 2008 23:51:00 GMT

Congressional aides hope to finalize a renewal of the Higher Education Act by Memorial Day that merges different versions of the proposed bill passed separately by the House of Representatives and the Senate last year, according to an article in The Chronicle of Higher Education (“Compromise Higher-Education Bill Takes Shape in Congress,” May 14, 2008).

Although the draft of the measure that is circulating Washington does not include provisions on graduate education, new programs, or private student loans — three of the bill’s 11 sections — the measure is already nearly 700 pages.

The issues that the two houses appear to have reached a compromise on include college cost watch lists, accreditation, and campus piracy:

Negotiators hope to give consumers more accurate and useful information about higher education costs by bolstering current watch lists. These lists, established by the House bill, already identify the most and least expensive colleges and those with the highest percentage of tuition increases. But under the compromise bill, institutions with the highest and lowest “net price” would also be listed.

The current 15 members of the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity, which advises the Department of Education on accreditation, would be replaced with 18 new members, six each appointed by the secretary of education, the Senate, and the House.

Colleges would be required to develop plans to detect and prevent illegal downloading of music and videos on college campuses and to offer alternatives to such illegal downloading.

Issues that are still being negotiated include whether states should be punished for cutting their higher education budgets, whether textbook publishers and colleges should be required to disclose more information about the costs of the books, and whether colleges should be required to notify students and employees within 30 minutes of a campus emergency.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit