Student Loan Blog : The New York Times

Students Left Holding the Bag as Loan Forgiveness Programs Vanish

Student Loan Girl — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:30:00 GMT

College graduates who were lured into high-need fields, including teaching, nursing, and public service, by programs that would forgive a portion or all of their student loans are receiving this sobering news: The cavalry isn’t coming after all.

These graduates, who in some cases were enticed by the loan forgiveness programs to take out student loans that exceeded their earning potential, are now discovering they’re on the hook for their large debts — and are struggling to pay them — because the state agencies originally offering the loan forgiveness can no longer afford to do so.

“We’d gotten married in June and bought a house, pretty much planned our whole life,” said Travis Gay, a special education teacher in Kentucky (“Recession Imperils Loan Forgiveness Programs ,” The New York Times, May 27, 2009).

Gay and his wife, Stephanie, also a teacher, thought they had a handle on repaying the $100,000 they owed in combined student loans. They were under the impression that a portion of their college loans would be forgiven each year over the next five years under a state program offering loan forgiveness for schoolteachers.

Then the Gays received a letter from the Kentucky Higher Education Student Loan Corporation, the lending agency that offered the program, “saying that our forgiveness this year was next to nothing.”

The student loan agency contends that it never promised the thousands of indebted public school teachers and nurses who have been affected by cuts to the program that their loans would definitely be forgiven. Financing for the loan forgiveness program was never actually guaranteed, says Ted Franzeim, vice president of customer relations for the student loan agency.

And it’s not just Kentucky borrowers who are being hurt by program cuts. Student loan forgiveness programs are on the chopping block throughout the country as the state agencies and nonprofit student loan organizations that sponsor these programs reel from dwindling government aid and strained market conditions.

The New Hampshire Higher Education Loan Corporation, for example, suspended its loan forgiveness program for teachers, and the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Authority has put the brakes on its loan forgiveness program for nurses and people called to active duty in the military.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Private Student Loans: Proceed With Caution

Student Loan Girl — Mon, 04 May 2009 21:07:00 GMT

Although the government has taken steps to bolster the federal student loan program by expanding Pell Grant awards and raising the maximum award amount of federal Stafford student loans, federal financial aid will still not be enough for many families to pay for college this year.

Grappling with stock market losses that have negatively affected 529 college savings plans and with declining home values that have essentially made home equity loans nonexistent, families of college students will likely have to rely more on private student loans, in addition to federal aid, this year to help pay for their education expenses, reports The New York Times (“Students’ First Lesson: Beware Loans’ Fine Print", May 2, 2009).

But the Times warns that private student loan borrowers need to be particularly cautious when applying for loans.

Private student loan lenders can set their own loan terms and aren’t required to inform their borrowers of the loans rates, fees, and terms. Citing data compiled by Student Lending Analytics, a company that helps schools analyze lending programs, the Times advises families applying for private student loans to weigh their options carefully and to take a close look at the fine print.

Interest Rates Vary From Lender to Lender

Unlike federal student loans, which have fixed interest rates, private student loans carry an average interest rate of 11 percent, according to Student Lending Analytics. However, lenders charge interest rates higher than 11 percent and, in some cases, won’t disclose the interest rate a borrower will be charged until after a borrower signs a promissory note.

Banks offer fixed-rate loans ranging from 7 percent to 12 percent, with big banks charging the highest rates. But at times, banks — particularly JPMorgan Chase, PNC Financial, and SunTrust Bank — hike up the rates on these loans by two to three percentage points if a borrower misses just one loan payment.

The variable-rate loans that private lenders offer can be tied to a specified interest rate index, like the prime rate, and their rates can vary depending on the changes to rate index. Chase, for example, charges interest as high as 13.5 percent on these loans.

Lenders Should Disclose All Fees

Tim Ranzetta, the founder of Student Lending Analytics, says lenders should be required to disclose any adjustments they make to an interest rate when a borrower misses a payment or when any other negative activity takes place on a borrower’s account.

Currently, lenders don’t disclose all the possible fees borrowers may be charged in the servicing and collection of their student loans, and lenders’ loan contracts don’t always inform borrowers of the borrower benefits promised in the lender advertisements, including the possibility of a borrower being charged a lower interest rate after graduation.

Ranzetta says, in addition to demanding that lenders fully disclose their loan terms, lenders should also be required to list their advertised benefits in the promissory note in order to contractually obligate lenders to offer their benefits.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

The Plot Thickens for the Future of Student Lending

Student Loan Girl — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:00:00 GMT

It’s “all hands on deck” for federal student loan lenders. The banks and third-party student loan providers that make up the Federal Family Education Loan Program have made it abundantly clear that they’re not going to roll over and accept the terms of the Obama administration’s proposal to axe their loan program in favor of the Education Department’s Direct Loan Program without a fight, The New York Times reports (“Plan to Change Student Lending Sets Up a Fight,” April 12, 2009)

“We can either meet or beat the budget savings that are in the president’s budget with the exact same system that we have got working now with maybe a few tweaks,” said Albert Lord, chief executive of Sallie Mae, the largest student loan provider participating in the FFEL program.

According to Congressional Budget Office calculations, establishing the Direct Loan Program as the sole provider of federal student loans is projected to save the government $94 billion over the next 10 years, savings that President Obama has said would be funneled directly into the federal Pell Grant Program for low-income students.

Lender-Proposed Alternatives Come Up Short

Lord and other FFELP lenders who oppose the administration’s plan are pushing for a compromise between the Obama plan and the current system that would allow them to continue offering students valuable lending services — quality customer relations, billing, and default prevention and collection — and still achieve Obama’s goal of saving taxpayers money.

FFELP lenders say such dually-beneficial partnerships are possible, which can be evidenced by a compromise that Congress approved last year that allows FFELP lenders to originate student loans using federal money and to resell the loans back to the government. FFELP lenders, which provide more than $56 billion of the nation’s federal student loans, were able to continue making loans to families and the government was able to ensure that families still had access to federal student loans.

But the savings Sallie Mae projects under its compromise plan still only add up to about 82 percent of the president’s savings goal over the next five years.

Supporters of the president’s plan say that this savings shortfall, as well as the fact that FFELP lenders are still relying on the government’s help to retain lending capital, raises the question, “why do we even need private lenders,” asked Representative Timothy Bishop, D–N.Y., a former provost of Southampton College.

Bishop argues that expanding the Direct Loan Program, which provides federal student loan funds directly to more than 1,500 schools is “obvious and long overdue,” being that over the last few decades private lenders have earned huge profits at relatively no risk because the government guarantees repayment up to 97 percent.

Factional In-Fighting Could Favor Lenders

In addition to battling lenders, lawmakers are also fighting an internal battle. Republicans say Obama’s plan is just another means to expand government control over the private sector, while Democrats are divided, with some legislators favoring the plan while others, who represent districts that rely heavily on student loan providers for employment, are siding with private lenders.

Allen Boyd, D–Fla., argues that the president’s proposal could jeopardize thousands of jobs across the country, including 650 in his own district, at a time when unemployment is already rampant. And the states that administer loans through state-based guarantee agencies, considered quasi-government entities that benefit the same as private lenders, are fighting to retain their lending business.

To help keep these quasi-government agencies afloat if they lose their FFELP business, the Obama administration has proposed spending $500 million a year on these agencies’ financial literacy programs and services.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

State Colleges Cut Staff, Programs as Budgets Slashed

Student Loan Girl — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:32:00 GMT

Michael Crow, the president of Arizona State University who seven years ago promised to make ASU “The New American University” and to grow the school’s enrollment to 100,000 students by 2020, could see his plans go unfulfilled because of state budget cuts, reports The New York Times (“State Colleges Also Face Cuts in Ambitions,” March 17, 2009).

Since last June, ASU has lost $88 million in state funding, which amounts to 18 percent of the university’s base budget.

“The New American University has died; welcome to the Neutered American University,” the Arizona school’s student newspaper editorialized last month after ASU announced it would be eliminating more than 500 jobs, closing 48 programs and requiring remaining employees to take 10 to 15 days of unpaid leave this spring.

While ASU students said they believe school president Michael Crow is doing his best to protect them from further funding cuts, they also said the state’s budget cuts will negatively affect the quality of their education.

ASU Not Alone, Colleges Struggling Nationwide

Public colleges across the country are experiencing layoffs, salary freezes, and even enrollment reductions as they grapple with shrinking state funding in the current recession.

The University of Florida recently eliminated 430 faculty and staff positions, the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, recently laid off around 100 employees, and the University of Vermont has eliminated 16 positions, left 22 faculty positions vacant, and frozen the salaries of certain staff, The New York Times reports.

And California’s higher education system, which serves 3.3 million students — nearly 20 percent of college student nationwide — is among the nation’s college systems hardest hit by this recession. Both the University of California system and the California State University system have lost hundreds of millions of dollars in state funding and have been forced to shrink their enrollment numbers.

“What’s happening, everywhere, is what’s happening to Michael Crow,” said Jane Wellman, executive director of the Delta Project on Postsecondary Costs, Productivity and Accountability, an organization that studies college spending. “The trend line is states disinvesting in higher education.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

College Unattainable for Undocumented Immigrants

Student Loan Girl — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:08:00 GMT

Judah Lakin, a Rhode Island high school teacher, spends much of his time trying to help his students prepare for college. But even if his students have what it takes to pursue a higher education, many of them are undocumented immigrants and will never step foot on a college campus because they don’t have access to federal financial aid or in-state tuition, The New York Times reports (“Longtime Residents Not Allowed In-State Tuition,” March 8, 2009).

Twenty-two percent of Rhode Island children live in immigrant families and, like immigrant students in 39 other states, they’re ineligible for in-state tuition. Because out-of-state tuition often costs three times as much as in-state tuition — a price difference of $16,000 at the University of Rhode Island for example — many undocumented students are priced out of a college education.

And since federal law prohibits undocumented students from qualifying for federal grants and student loans, these students have little to no means of finding college financial aid.

The lack of college prospects for undocumented students hurts the state, says Robert Carothers, president of the University of Rhode Island.

“It does no good to keep people who live here from an education by which they could make contributions back to the state. It perpetuates ignorance, which is not in our interest,” Carothers says.

Undocumented Students Naïve About the Effects of Their Non-Residency

Lakin’s immigrant students are often completely unaware of how easily their undocumented status can derail their college aspirations, he says.

One of his students is more than academically qualified to attend a Rhode Island college or university but can’t afford the out-of-state tuition fees she would be required to pay at a local college because of her undocumented status. Although the student has lived in the United States since she was a baby and her mother has a legal work permit and pays taxes, the student has not established U.S. residency.

“This student always assumed she’d go to a good college,” says Lakin, who has asked his school district to help educate students about all of their legal residency options. “She’s used to getting awards and internships, but nobody ever explained to her the gravity of what remaining undocumented would mean for her college prospects.”

To help undocumented students attain a college education, state legislator Grace Diaz has introduced legislation that would grant in-state tuition rights to undocumented students who’ve lived in the state for more than three years.

But even though the legislation has gained some support, it has received strong opposition from anti-immigration supporters, including Terry Gorman, executive director of Rhode Islanders for Immigration Law Enforcement, who feels it's “unfair to U.S. citizens to have to pay the tax burden for the college educations of illegals.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

CUNY Wants to Be a Model for Community College Education

Student Loan Girl — Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:53:00 GMT

The City University of New York school system hopes to open a “college of the future” that would limit enrollment to under 5,000 students, offer degrees or certificates only in fields with promising job growth, and serve as a model for community colleges nationwide, The New York Times reports (“CUNY Plans New Approach to Community College,” Jan. 26, 2009).

The proposed Manhattan community college is set to open in two years, but planning for the school has only gone as far as a 120-page blueprint. CUNY is currently tapping a number of private donors to help fund the new school, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which has committed hundreds of millions of dollars to help double the number of postsecondary graduates in the United States by 2025.

Students of the proposed college would be required to attend a four-to-six week summer orientation, take classes full time, and keep in close and consistent contact with academic advisors. The school’s curriculum would focus heavily on math and literacy.

Pilot Program Shows Initial Successes

For two years CUNY has been successfully incorporating many of the proposed ideas for the new college into a system-wide pilot program called the Accelerated Study in Associate Programs, known as ASAP.

The 1,132 students enrolled in ASAP receive free tuition, books, and commuter passes for the New York metro system. Students also are given priority over other CUNY students for class registration, making it easier for them to manage work and school schedules, and the opportunity to meet with counselors twice a month.

ASAP students have earned higher grade point averages than CUNY students not in the program, a 2.61 GPA compared to a 2.43, and have taken more credit hours than non-ASAP students, 11 credit hours compared to 9.6. And 80 percent of ASAP students have remained enrolled at CUNY after two years, compared to 60 percent of CUNY students not involved in the program.

“What we promised was that within three years, we would graduate half the students who came in,” says CUNY Chancellor Matthew Goldstein. “We are on track to do that.”

CUNY School Could Start a Community College Trend

Goldstein says the proposed college, which would be New York’s first new two-year school in 37 years, could help free up resources at CUNY’s six existing schools, which have experienced a 31-percent increase over the past decade, and could help improve the community college system’s 30-percent graduation rate.

In the long run, Goldstein believes that CUNY’s proposed higher education curriculum could serve as a model for the nation’s 1,045 two-year schools, which currently enroll 6.2 million students, about 35 percent of the nation’s college students.

Goldstein says institutions of higher education “need bold and new approaches” to how they engage, support, and educate students.

“Our students will face increasingly competitive pressures in an unforgiving economy, and getting a degree matters,” he told the State Assembly’s Committee on Higher Education during a budget cut hearing. “It is therefore in their interest to attend community colleges where the focus is on high standards and degree completion.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Bill Gates To Give Low-Income Students $70 Million In Grants

Student Loan Girl — Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:16:00 GMT

To help ensure that low-income students can afford a college education in the midst of a recession, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is committing nearly $70 million in grants toward its goal of doubling the number of low-income students who earn a college degree or vocational credential by age 26, The New York Times reports (“Gates Grants Aim to Help Low-Income Students Finish College,” Dec. 5, 2008).

Anthony Carnevale, director of the Center on Education and the Workforce at Georgetown University, says the foundation’s latest efforts to assist low-income students couldn’t come at a more opportune time since college-educated employees are more likely to get jobs during a recession. The unemployment rate for people without a college education is generally four times as high as for those with a two- or four-year degree, he says.

Low-income students are already at a disadvantage, graduating from college at only a 25-percent rate. And a majority of the 560,000 high school students in the U.S. who graduate in the top of their class, Carnevale adds, don’t earn a degree within eight years of their high school graduation and come from families that earn less than $85,000 a year.

“We console ourselves that we’re going to be fine in the world because we have this great higher education system and all our kids are going to college,” said Hillary Pennington, who will direct the Gates Foundation’s postsecondary effort. “But [low-income students are] not finishing. That is enormously debilitating for young people.”

Foundation Proposes Far-Reaching Initiative

While the Gates Foundation — the world’s largest philanthropy — has given almost $2 billion to help U.S. high schools make needed improvements over the last eight years and dedicated another $2 billion for minority college scholarships, this is the foundation’s first endeavor into postsecondary education reform and it hopes to gain the support of other groups and organizations.

“The Gates Foundation can’t address the financial burdens by itself, but its focus on what types of programs work best may help spur action by the federal government,” said Richard Kahlenberg, a senior fellow with the Century Foundation.

If the foundation meets its goal, the number of U.S. college graduates each year would increase by 250,000.

The foundation will dedicate $33.2 million of its $70-million grant initiative to help prepare postsecondary education students to better succeed in college and $13 million in grants to assist the MDRC, a nonprofit education research organization, in expanding its performance-based scholarships for low-income college students.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

New York AG Examines Colleges’ Relationships With Health Insurers

Student Loan Girl — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:30:00 GMT

New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is investigating the relationships between colleges and the health insurance companies they do business with just two years after he launched a similar investigation that uncovered conflicts of interest between some colleges and student loan companies, The New York Times reports (“Cuomo Investigating Colleges’ Deals With Health Insurers,” Nov. 17, 2008).

Investigators will focus on determining if schools adequately disclose the policy terms and costs of their school-sponsored health insurance plans to their students, as well as whether or not insurers offer schools a monetary incentive to require that their students buy health insurance through a particular provider.

In an e-mail message, Benjamin Lawsky, special assistant to the attorney general, wrote “We are primarily focused on whether insurance companies are paying schools to push students into health coverage they don’t really need and shouldn’t really want.”

“With students and their families being financially squeezed at every turn,” he added, “colleges must ensure that they are looking out for students’ best interest first and foremost as opposed to their own financial bottom line.”

Cuomo has requested health insurance–related documents from six State University of New York schools — Binghamton, Buffalo State, Oswego, Purchase, Stony Brook, and the University at Buffalo. Investigators have asked to see copies of the schools’ requests for proposals from insurers, insurance contracts, and the information given to students about the health plans available to them, as well as statistics on the health insurance premiums paid by students.

Four institutions, Georgetown University, Columbia University, Cornell University, and Sarah Lawrence College, said they had received subpoenas.

Parents have complained that some schools require students to purchase school-sponsored health insurance, even though the student is already insured under a family health insurance policy, said James Boyle, president of College Parents of America, an association of parents of college students.

Although “the vast majority of college students” are covered under their parent’s health insurance, most campus health centers don’t accept insurance plans that aren’t affiliated with the school, Boyle added.

“Instead,” he said, “some schools force the student, as a condition of enrollment, to purchase health insurance policies offered by the school.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Goal Financial Reaches Agreement With New York Attorney General

Student Loan Girl — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:53:00 GMT

Alexandria, Virginia-based Goal Financial is the most recent student loan company to reach a settlement with the New York Attorney General’s office, whose investigation into the student loan industry revealed that several lenders used deceptive marketing practices to lure borrowers, The New York Times reports (“Another Student Loan Company Settles With New York,” Oct. 30, 2008).

The attorney general’s office found that some lenders, including Goal, led consumers to believe that their direct mail pieces were marketing low-interest federal student loans and not private student loans (“Student Loan Companies in Settlement Talks,” The Associated Press, Sept. 5, 2008). “Some of the seals [used by private lenders] looked very similar to those of the federal government,” said Alex Detrick, a spokesman for the attorney general's office.

Goal was also accused of offering incentives like gift cards, iPods, and other items to entice borrowers into taking out private student loans. In a letter sent to Goal last July, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo stated that the student loan company’s marketing collateral also gave “misleading examples of monthly payment amounts and annual savings,” the Associated Press reported.

Goal has agreed to adopt a marketing code of conduct created by Cuomo’s office that prohibits the use of deceptive marketing tactics and forbids student loan lenders from offering gifts as incentives to attract borrowers. The student loan company will also pay $350,000 to a fund that will be used to educate students about their financial aid options.

“In these times of increasingly tight credit, it is crucial,” Cuomo said, “that students and their parents get solid, truthful information on which to base their loan decisions.”

Eight other student loan providers have agreed to abide by the marketing code of conduct, and seven of those companies have already contributed more than $1.4 million to the financial aid–related education fund.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

SAT and ACT Tests Not the Best Predictors of College Success, Study Finds

Student Loan Girl — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:12:00 GMT

The colleges and universities that use students’ SAT and ACT standardized test scores when making college admissions and financial aid decisions should base these decisions on tests that more closely reflect a student’s high school achievement and understanding of the high school curriculum, according to the recommendations made by a new commission comprised of influential college admissions officials.

The commission, led by William R. Fitzsimmons, Dean of Admissions and Financial Aid at Harvard University, recently completed a yearlong study that questioned the relevancy of SAT and ACT tests for college admissions (“College Panel Calls for Less Focus on SATs,” The New York Times, Sept. 21, 2008).

“It would be much better for the country,” Fitzsimmons says, “to have students focusing on high school courses that, based on evidence, will prepare them well for college and also prepare them well for the real world beyond college, instead of their spending enormous amounts of time trying to game the SAT.”

Admissions officers should rely instead on exams that are closer linked to high school curriculum like the College Board’s Advanced Placement tests and SAT Subject Tests and the International Baccalaureate exams when making admissions decisions, Fitzsimmons says. Unlike the SAT and ACT exams, he argues, these other tests have fewer ties to the billion-dollar test-prep industry.

Test Scores Indicate Students Who Are Well-Off Have An Advantage

Fitzsimmons’ research group, convened by the National Association for College Admission Counseling, found that the nature of standardized testing places less emphasis on students learning their high school curriculum and more emphasis on test preparation — a discrepancy that favors affluent students who can afford test-prep resources.

The commission’s report found that standardized test scores emphasized the socio-economic differences of the SAT’s and ACT’s test-taking population and were reflective of a student’s race and ethnicity, socio-economic class, and their family’s level of educational attainment.

“Society likes to think that the SAT measures people’s ability or merit,” Fitzsimmons says. “But no one in college admissions who visits the range of secondary schools we visit, and goes to the communities we visit … can come away thinking that standardized tests can be a measure of someone’s true worth or ability.”

Testing Companies, Schools Disagree on Report’s Findings

Representatives from the College Board — which administers the SAT exam, taken by 1.6 million high school students this year — and ACT Inc. — which is responsible for the ACT exam, taken by 1.4 million students this year — both disputed the report’s findings. The companies contend that their tests do measure students’ understanding of classroom material, not just their test-preparation skills, according to a Bloomberg article (“Colleges Shouldn’t Rely on SAT, ACT Tests Study Says,” Sept. 22, 2008).

“Hundreds of national research studies show that the SAT is a valid predictor of college success,” the College Board wrote in a statement. “We have long advised that the use of the SAT in the admission process is in combination with high school grades.”

Prior to the report’s recommendations, only 280 four-year schools, including Wake Forest University, Smith College, Bates College, and the University of Wisconsin, had stopped requiring the standardized tests for admissions, and the report calls for more schools to follow suit.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Government Warns: Pell Grant Program in Trouble

Student Loan Girl — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:47:00 GMT

Without additional taxpayer funds next year, the government’s “most important” federal financial aid program may be unable to provide Pell Grants to millions of eligible low-income students, likely pricing these students out of a higher education, according to an article in The New York Times (“Pell Grants Said to Face a Shortfall,” Sept. 17, 2008).

In a memorandum issued last week, the Department of Education warned that it predicts a $6 billion shortage for the federal Pell Grant program next year, stemming from continuous budget shortfalls and compounded by the record-high number of students qualifying for the federal Pell Grant program.

Rising tuition costs, shrinking state aid to colleges and universities, and a growing number of adults who are reenrolling in college are all putting a strain on federal financial aid resources, particularly on Pell Grants, which don’t have to be repaid. This school year alone, six million students out of the nine million who applied for federal financial aid received Pell Grants, some of the highest numbers the program has seen since its inception in 1972.

“It’s the mother of all shortfalls,” said Barmak Nassirian, associate executive director of the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers. “There’s more unmet need than anyone predicted.”

Last year Congress appropriated nearly $14 billion for the Pell Grant program, but as the troubled economy continues to force adults out of the workforce and back into the classroom, the Department of Education said it will either need to allocate more taxpayer money to the Pell Grant program or decrease the grant award amounts students can receive next year.

Should the Education Department decide to reduce Pell Grant awards, it would make an announcement detailing its decision sometime in February 2009, according to the memorandum.

“If [the Pell Grant program] is threatened, you’ll hear about it,” said Edward M. Elmendorf, senior vice president of the American Association of State Colleges and Universities. “The decibel level will be deafening.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Princeton Review Exposes Thousands of Students’ Personal Info

Student Loan Girl — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:24:00 GMT

For nearly two months, thousands of the The Princeton Review’s private files including folders containing the company’s and test-takers’ personal data were unintentionally made accessible to anyone with an Internet connection, according to an article in The New York Times (“Student Files Are Exposed on Web Site,” Aug. 18, 2008).

Digital files containing student identification information, test-preparation materials, and internal communication documents, which should have been password protected, have been listed on an easy-to-find, publically viewable webpage ever since the test-preparatory firm switched Internet service providers in late June.

The error was discovered by a rival company while it was conducting competitive research on The Princeton Review. The rival company, which asked not to be named, provided the Times with the Web address containing the files. The Princeton Review promptly shut off access to the exposed private data on its website after the newspaper informed it of the error on Monday. It is not known how many people may have accessed the files.

Security Error Blamed On Company’s Faulty Internet Protection Practices

One of the files listed the identification information of about 34,000 Florida elementary school students, including their birthdays, ethnicities, and whether they had learning disabilities. The school system had hired The Princeton Review to build an online tool that would measure students’ academic progress.

Another 74,000 students in a Virginia school system — which had also contracted with The Princeton Review to measure and improve student performance — had their names and birth dates exposed.

The test-preparatory company’s own educational materials for the LSAT, PSAT and SAT exams, as well as its course schedules, internal instructor evaluations, and the entire texts of some of its study books like “Cracking the LSAT” were also open to the public. Another folder on the site contained digital scans of eight official SAT and PSAT exams from 2005 to 2007 that included accompanying files explaining how The Princeton Review uses older exams to create practice tests.

Mike Haro, an analyst for Sophos, an Internet security firm, says the security mishap is an indication that The Princeton Review was not following “accepted” Internet-security protocol by keeping confidential files and innocuous files on the same computers. “In this case it would have made sense for the company to separate information such as names of the students from their test scores and whatever confidential information the company had,” Haro said. “But we are finding that companies today don’t change until they experience the pain of a data breach that is exposed to the public.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

College Offers Students a No-Cost, No-Student-Loan Education With Funds From Its $1.1 Billion Endowment

Student Loan Girl — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:39:00 GMT

Berea College is drawing the attention of lawmakers for its no-frills approach to education and its free tuition policy.

The private Kentucky college — founded 150 years ago to educate freed slaves and “poor white mountaineers” — accepts only applicants from low-income families and charges no tuition, according to an article in The New York Times (“With No Frills or Tuition, a College Draws Notice,” July 21, 2008).

Every Berea student is awarded a four-year tuition scholarship and the school doesn't offer student loans.

School Spends Endowment on Students, Not on High-End Amenities

Despite its $1.1 billion endowment Berea, unlike other colleges with large endowments, has no football team, coed dorms, hot tubs, or rock climbing walls. Students eat food from the college’s own farm, make the furniture used to furnish the school, and are required to work 10 hours a week in an on-campus job.

Although Berea keeps costs down with its streamlined approach to higher education, without tuition revenue to supplement its funding, Berea relies on endowment income to cover 80 percent of its $43 million education and general budget, and about two-thirds of its $55 million operating budget.

“You can literally come to Berea with nothing but what you can carry, and graduate debt free,” says Joseph Bagnoli, the school’s associate provost for enrollment management. “We call it the best education money can’t buy.”

A Push to Use Endowments for the Public Good

News of Berea’s unusual approach to higher education is spurring debates about whether the nation’s wealthiest universities are doing enough for the general public to warrant their tax-exempt status, or if they’re simply hoarding money to serve an elite few, writes New York Times reporter Tamar Lewin.

In January, the Senate Finance Committee requested detailed endowment and spending data from the 136 colleges and universities with endowments of at least $500 million, with an eye toward possibly forcing them to spend at least 5 percent of their assets each year, as foundations are required to do.

Dozens of wealthy colleges have since increased their financial aid to low- and middle-income students, in some cases, replacing loans with grants. More than three-quarters of the students at Berea already receive Pell Grants.

“You see some of these selective liberal arts colleges building new physical education facilities with these huge sheets of glass and these coffee and juice bars, and charging students $40,000 a year, and you have to ask, does this contribute to the public good, or is it just a way for the college to keep up with the Jones?” says Berea’s president Larry Shinn.

He adds, “We are a tax-exempt institution, so I think the public has a right to demand that out educational mission be at the heart of our expenditures.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Proposed Legislation Would Prevent Student Loan Lenders from ‘Cherry-Picking’ Schools They Lend To

Student Loan Girl — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:14:00 GMT

To ensure all students have access to student loans regardless of what type of school they attend, two Democratic senators introduced legislation Tuesday that would prohibit banks and other lenders from “picking and choosing” which institutions of higher education they do business with, according to a New York Times article (“Bill Promotes Universal College Loans,” June 18, 2008).

Under the proposal, lenders that participate in the Federal Family Education Loan Program would have to extend credit to any eligible student, regardless of a student’s income or the type of institution they attend, as long as the student’s college is a member of the FFEL program, writes Times reporter Jonathan Glater.

Senators Patty Murray, D-Wash., and Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., introduced the legislation in response to the decision of Citibank, JPMorgan Chase, PNC, and SunTrust to stop offering student loans to community colleges and other two-year institutions.

“Lenders offering loans backed by taxpayer dollars shouldn’t be able to discriminate against certain schools or students,” Murray said in a statement. “Denying loans based on school, program length, or income level locks the door for far too many.”

Bill Faces an Uncertain Future

Banks who have ceased lending to certain two-year institutions contend that they lose money on the loans. Schools that have been cut off by the banks tend to have higher default rates and fewer borrowers with small loan amounts — financial factors that, lenders say, make business at these schools less profitable.

But financial aid administrators counter that lenders should not be allowed to “cherry-pick,” because selective lending could make it harder for low-income students to pay for college.

The proposal, which is under review by the U.S. Department of Education, has already been met with controversy. Some financial aid officials support the measure as way of ensuring access to student loans, while others believe it might have the unintended consequence of pushing lenders out of the federal student-loan business altogether at time when over 100 lenders have already left the FFEL program.

While the bill’s prospects are unclear, Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, is expected to co-sponsor the bill.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Bogged Down by Controversy, West Virginia University President Resigns

Student Loan Girl — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:15:00 GMT

The president of West Virginia University is resigning following an independent panel’s report that found the university had shown “seriously flawed” judgment in improperly awarding a master’s degree to the daughter of the state’s governor.

University president, Mike Garrison, will step down from his position in September after months of controversy surrounding the school’s decision to award the degree, according to an article in The New York Times (“University Head Resigns After Degree Dispute,” June 7, 2008).

His departure follows the resignations of university provost, Gerald Land, and business school dean, R. Stephen Sears, who left their administrative jobs and returned to their tenured positions after the panel reported its findings April 23.

The three resignations are tied to the university’s decision to award a MBA to Heather Bresch, longtime friend and former business associate of Garrison and the daughter of West Virginia Gov. Joe Manchin III, even though she did not have the sufficient amount of academic credits for the degree.

University’s Conflicts of Interest Abound

The controversy surfaced in late December after a reporter for The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette called the university to confirm Bresch’s academic credentials after she was promoted to chief operating officer of Mylan Inc., the world’s third-largest generic drug company.

Mylan employs 2,000 people in Morgantown, Va., where West Virginia University’s campus is located. The company’s chairman Milan Puskar is the university’s top donor — he gave $20 million to the school in 2003 — and he is among Manchin’s largest campaign contributors, writes New York Times reporter Ian Urbina.

The board of governors, which publicly supported Garrison throughout the ordeal, thanked Garrison for his service and said in a statement that it hoped Garrison’s decision to resign would help begin a process of healing on campus.

But the school may face further controversy. A continuing internal audit by the business school indicates that as many as 70 or so students may have received degrees over the last decade despite insufficient credits.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit