Student Loan Blog : Pell Grant program

Students Could Wave Goodbye to Merit–Based Federal Aid

Student Loan Girl — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:41:00 GMT

In another move to restructure the federal financial aid system, President Obama has proposed ending the government’s five-year foray into merit-based student aid and redirecting those financial aid funds to the need-based Pell Grant program, reports The Chronicle of Higher Education (“An Experiment in Merit-Based Student Aid Is Likely to End,” June 26, 2009).

The Academic Competitiveness Grant and the National Science and Mathematics Access to Retain Talent Grant programs were created by Congress in 2006 to encourage students to take academically “rigorous” coursework in high school and then choose college majors in fields with labor shortages.

Only students who are eligible for need-based Pell Grants can qualify for the Academic Competitiveness Grants, which provide $750 and $1,300 to college freshmen and sophomores respectively, and for the SMART grants, which provide $4,000 to college juniors and seniors who major in science, math, and certain foreign languages.

But so far both grant programs have fallen short of their participation projections, due in large part to the Department of Education’s failure to promote the programs, as reported by the department’s own inspector general in 2008.

The other major problem has been the programs’ vague qualification criteria, which has made it difficult for financial aid officers’ to determine award recipients. The American Council on Education, in a 2006 letter to the Department of Education, called the grant program’s guidelines “unworkable” and defined them as placing a “breathtaking administrative burden” on colleges’ financial aid officers.

Obama’s Proposal Receives Support From Education Officials

Education Department officials support the president’s proposal to make the Pell program an entitlement with annual increases tied to inflation and to raise the maximum Pell awards by $200 to $5,500 by the 2010–11 academic year because, they say, the Pell Grant program better serves low-income students than the competitiveness grant programs.

This proposal “would benefit the vast majority of the nearly six million Pell Grant recipients worldwide,” even though the annual increases amount to significantly less funding for the one in 10 students who qualify for the Academic Competitiveness and SMART grants.

Even former Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings, who crafted the merit-based programs under the Bush administration, backs the proposal.

“Do higher education officials and K-12 officials prefer free money with no strings attached? Absolutely,” Spellings said. “But if we’re trying to move the needle, putting resources behind our policy goals is a more powerful and prudent way to go."

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

The Plot Thickens for the Future of Student Lending

Student Loan Girl — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:00:00 GMT

It’s “all hands on deck” for federal student loan lenders. The banks and third-party student loan providers that make up the Federal Family Education Loan Program have made it abundantly clear that they’re not going to roll over and accept the terms of the Obama administration’s proposal to axe their loan program in favor of the Education Department’s Direct Loan Program without a fight, The New York Times reports (“Plan to Change Student Lending Sets Up a Fight,” April 12, 2009)

“We can either meet or beat the budget savings that are in the president’s budget with the exact same system that we have got working now with maybe a few tweaks,” said Albert Lord, chief executive of Sallie Mae, the largest student loan provider participating in the FFEL program.

According to Congressional Budget Office calculations, establishing the Direct Loan Program as the sole provider of federal student loans is projected to save the government $94 billion over the next 10 years, savings that President Obama has said would be funneled directly into the federal Pell Grant Program for low-income students.

Lender-Proposed Alternatives Come Up Short

Lord and other FFELP lenders who oppose the administration’s plan are pushing for a compromise between the Obama plan and the current system that would allow them to continue offering students valuable lending services — quality customer relations, billing, and default prevention and collection — and still achieve Obama’s goal of saving taxpayers money.

FFELP lenders say such dually-beneficial partnerships are possible, which can be evidenced by a compromise that Congress approved last year that allows FFELP lenders to originate student loans using federal money and to resell the loans back to the government. FFELP lenders, which provide more than $56 billion of the nation’s federal student loans, were able to continue making loans to families and the government was able to ensure that families still had access to federal student loans.

But the savings Sallie Mae projects under its compromise plan still only add up to about 82 percent of the president’s savings goal over the next five years.

Supporters of the president’s plan say that this savings shortfall, as well as the fact that FFELP lenders are still relying on the government’s help to retain lending capital, raises the question, “why do we even need private lenders,” asked Representative Timothy Bishop, D–N.Y., a former provost of Southampton College.

Bishop argues that expanding the Direct Loan Program, which provides federal student loan funds directly to more than 1,500 schools is “obvious and long overdue,” being that over the last few decades private lenders have earned huge profits at relatively no risk because the government guarantees repayment up to 97 percent.

Factional In-Fighting Could Favor Lenders

In addition to battling lenders, lawmakers are also fighting an internal battle. Republicans say Obama’s plan is just another means to expand government control over the private sector, while Democrats are divided, with some legislators favoring the plan while others, who represent districts that rely heavily on student loan providers for employment, are siding with private lenders.

Allen Boyd, D–Fla., argues that the president’s proposal could jeopardize thousands of jobs across the country, including 650 in his own district, at a time when unemployment is already rampant. And the states that administer loans through state-based guarantee agencies, considered quasi-government entities that benefit the same as private lenders, are fighting to retain their lending business.

To help keep these quasi-government agencies afloat if they lose their FFELP business, the Obama administration has proposed spending $500 million a year on these agencies’ financial literacy programs and services.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Government Warns: Pell Grant Program in Trouble

Student Loan Girl — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:47:00 GMT

Without additional taxpayer funds next year, the government’s “most important” federal financial aid program may be unable to provide Pell Grants to millions of eligible low-income students, likely pricing these students out of a higher education, according to an article in The New York Times (“Pell Grants Said to Face a Shortfall,” Sept. 17, 2008).

In a memorandum issued last week, the Department of Education warned that it predicts a $6 billion shortage for the federal Pell Grant program next year, stemming from continuous budget shortfalls and compounded by the record-high number of students qualifying for the federal Pell Grant program.

Rising tuition costs, shrinking state aid to colleges and universities, and a growing number of adults who are reenrolling in college are all putting a strain on federal financial aid resources, particularly on Pell Grants, which don’t have to be repaid. This school year alone, six million students out of the nine million who applied for federal financial aid received Pell Grants, some of the highest numbers the program has seen since its inception in 1972.

“It’s the mother of all shortfalls,” said Barmak Nassirian, associate executive director of the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers. “There’s more unmet need than anyone predicted.”

Last year Congress appropriated nearly $14 billion for the Pell Grant program, but as the troubled economy continues to force adults out of the workforce and back into the classroom, the Department of Education said it will either need to allocate more taxpayer money to the Pell Grant program or decrease the grant award amounts students can receive next year.

Should the Education Department decide to reduce Pell Grant awards, it would make an announcement detailing its decision sometime in February 2009, according to the memorandum.

“If [the Pell Grant program] is threatened, you’ll hear about it,” said Edward M. Elmendorf, senior vice president of the American Association of State Colleges and Universities. “The decibel level will be deafening.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

2009 Budget Resolution with More Money for Education Approved by Senate

Student Loan Girl — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 22:48:00 GMT

The U.S. Senate approved an $84.3-billion discretionary spending blueprint for the 2009 fiscal year that greatly increases federal funds for education as well as scientific research, according to an article in The Chronicle of Higher Education (“Senate Approves Budget Blueprint With More Money for Education and Science,” June 4, 2008).

The $84.3-billion figure represents an increase of 5.6 percent, or $8.2 billion, more than the current 2008 budget, and $8.4 billion, or 6 percent, more than the budget President Bush proposed for 2009. Since the House of Representatives is expected to pass the resolution this week, legislators may begin debating specific spending bills, such as increases to the federal Pell Grant program, as early as next week.

However, these measures probably will not make it through Congress before the new president is elected in November. Bush has threatened to veto any bills that exceed his spending limit, so lawmakers anticipate the possibility of financing education and other programs through a series of ongoing resolutions until a new president takes office.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit