Students Could Wave Goodbye to Merit–Based Federal Aid

Student Loan Girl — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:41:00 GMT

In another move to restructure the federal financial aid system, President Obama has proposed ending the government’s five-year foray into merit-based student aid and redirecting those financial aid funds to the need-based Pell Grant program, reports The Chronicle of Higher Education (“An Experiment in Merit-Based Student Aid Is Likely to End,” June 26, 2009).

The Academic Competitiveness Grant and the National Science and Mathematics Access to Retain Talent Grant programs were created by Congress in 2006 to encourage students to take academically “rigorous” coursework in high school and then choose college majors in fields with labor shortages.

Only students who are eligible for need-based Pell Grants can qualify for the Academic Competitiveness Grants, which provide $750 and $1,300 to college freshmen and sophomores respectively, and for the SMART grants, which provide $4,000 to college juniors and seniors who major in science, math, and certain foreign languages.

But so far both grant programs have fallen short of their participation projections, due in large part to the Department of Education’s failure to promote the programs, as reported by the department’s own inspector general in 2008.

The other major problem has been the programs’ vague qualification criteria, which has made it difficult for financial aid officers’ to determine award recipients. The American Council on Education, in a 2006 letter to the Department of Education, called the grant program’s guidelines “unworkable” and defined them as placing a “breathtaking administrative burden” on colleges’ financial aid officers.

Obama’s Proposal Receives Support From Education Officials

Education Department officials support the president’s proposal to make the Pell program an entitlement with annual increases tied to inflation and to raise the maximum Pell awards by $200 to $5,500 by the 2010–11 academic year because, they say, the Pell Grant program better serves low-income students than the competitiveness grant programs.

This proposal “would benefit the vast majority of the nearly six million Pell Grant recipients worldwide,” even though the annual increases amount to significantly less funding for the one in 10 students who qualify for the Academic Competitiveness and SMART grants.

Even former Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings, who crafted the merit-based programs under the Bush administration, backs the proposal.

“Do higher education officials and K-12 officials prefer free money with no strings attached? Absolutely,” Spellings said. “But if we’re trying to move the needle, putting resources behind our policy goals is a more powerful and prudent way to go."

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Federal Student Loan Lenders Fight for Survival

Student Loan Girl — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:52:00 GMT

In what is being viewed as a direct hit to private third-party lenders in the Federal Family Education Loan Program who are fighting to keep the program alive, the U.S. Department of Education’s preliminary data paints the FFEL program as a costly and ineffective system with a 7.3-percent student loan default rate, two whole points higher than the default rate for the Direct Loan Program (“Private Lenders Brace for Fight Over Student-Loan Role,” The Wall Street Journal, March 27, 2009).

Since its launch in the 1960s, FFELP has been the primary source of federal student loans. This year the FFEL program has already lent more than $56 billion in student loans, while the Direct Loan Program has lent just $20 billion. But President Obama has proposed axing the FFEL program, which costs the federal government billions of dollars in subsidies each year, in favor of the government’s Direct Loan Program, through which families borrow directly from the government.

FFELP lenders have said that the Education Department’s untimely release of the student loan default rate data — taken from fiscal year 2007 — was purely political since the government has never released preliminary default rate data and has never broken down the data by the two programs. Industry analysts say the data reflects the differences in the two programs: FFELP lenders typically cater to more students from for-profit schools who tend to default at a higher rate than students in the Direct Loan Program.

Department of Education officials have said they released the data in response to a U.S. Freedom of Information Act request from The Wall Street Journal and inquiries from Congressional leaders.

“It’s unfortunate the rates are being released before there is an analysis of them,” said Brett Lief, president of the National Council of Higher Education Loan Programs, a trade group that represents FFELP lenders and federal loan guarantee agencies. “This is very serious stuff and I’m saddened that it has come out like this.”

No Cut-and-Dry Solution to the FFELP Dilemma

While the Consumer Bankers Association, which represents certain FFELP lenders, has sent Congress a 2,500-signature petition asking legislators to reject the president’s proposal to eliminate the FFEL program, industry observers don’t see the battle over FFELP ending quickly or simply.

The Congressional Budget Office has said eliminating the program would save the government nearly $100 billion over the next 10 years, which President Obama plans to redirect to the Federal Pell Grant program. This potential funding boost for Pell Grants, which are awarded to the nation’s neediest students, could make it harder for legislators who support FFELP to successfully argue to keep the program alive.

However, some legislators who oppose the FFEL program face strong opposition from their home-state guarantee agencies that work with FFELP lenders to service college loans for students in their state. Legislators may also have to battle student loan giant Sallie Mae, which has said that keeping certain elements of FFELP might actually make it possible for the government to draw additional Pell Grant funding from FFELP itself. Sallie Mae has also pointed out that its borrowers, who partake in default prevention programs through state loan-guarantee agencies, are 30 percent less likely to default than direct loan borrowers.

“It’s certainly possible Congress would eliminate the program,” said Terry Hartle, a senior vice president of the American Council of Education, a trade group representing colleges and universities. “But it’s equally possible — and perhaps more so — to wring more savings out of the [FFEL] program and put the savings into Pell.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Student Loan Blog : Obama proposals

Students Could Wave Goodbye to Merit–Based Federal Aid

Federal Student Loan Lenders Fight for Survival