Student Loan Blog : Obama administration

Students’ College Access to Improve, Vice President Pledges

Student Loan Girl — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:50:00 GMT

Vice President Joe Biden intends to make higher education a reality for more young people, the Associated Press reports, in part by closing the gap between families’ incomes and rising college costs (“Biden Wants to Make Higher Ed More Affordable,” USA Today, April 18, 2009).

At a town hall–style meeting he hosted in St. Louis Biden told about 300 people that he’ll be asking the Treasury Department to figure out how to make college savings plans more effective and more reliable.

“We’re going to make a series of investments, investments in our families and our students,” he said, highlighting the administration’s efforts to improve tax breaks for families and increase need-based grants for low-and middle-income families.

White House Taps Existing Programs to Increase College Affordability

Since so many families save for college using tax-deferred 529 savings plans, which allow families to set aside funds to cover future tuition expenses, fees, books, and supplies, the Obama administration is examining a program that would allow families to take out low-interest loans against their 529 plans to help them cover college costs.

Obama has already increased funding for the need-based federal Pell Grant program, which helps low-income students afford school, but Biden said the Obama administration also wants to ensure continued Pell Grant funding by setting up the program to be automatically subsidized each year.

The government is also considering extending The American Opportunity Tax Credit beyond 2010, which allows families to claim a $2,500 tax credit for college expenses for up to four years.

But by far the most sweeping proposal from the Obama administration, which has drawn fierce criticism from leaders in the student loan industry, is the suggested cancelation of the federally funded student loan program.

Lenders say that cancelling the program will eliminate families’ option to choose from a variety of private lenders and federal student loan incentives and, instead, require them to borrow federal student loans through government’s Direct Loan Program.

Biden alleges that the move to cancel the federal student loan program would result in up to $94 billion in savings to the federal government over the next 10 years, which he said, “We can take … and reinvest … in more loans, more grants and more access to college.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

The Plot Thickens for the Future of Student Lending

Student Loan Girl — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:00:00 GMT

It’s “all hands on deck” for federal student loan lenders. The banks and third-party student loan providers that make up the Federal Family Education Loan Program have made it abundantly clear that they’re not going to roll over and accept the terms of the Obama administration’s proposal to axe their loan program in favor of the Education Department’s Direct Loan Program without a fight, The New York Times reports (“Plan to Change Student Lending Sets Up a Fight,” April 12, 2009)

“We can either meet or beat the budget savings that are in the president’s budget with the exact same system that we have got working now with maybe a few tweaks,” said Albert Lord, chief executive of Sallie Mae, the largest student loan provider participating in the FFEL program.

According to Congressional Budget Office calculations, establishing the Direct Loan Program as the sole provider of federal student loans is projected to save the government $94 billion over the next 10 years, savings that President Obama has said would be funneled directly into the federal Pell Grant Program for low-income students.

Lender-Proposed Alternatives Come Up Short

Lord and other FFELP lenders who oppose the administration’s plan are pushing for a compromise between the Obama plan and the current system that would allow them to continue offering students valuable lending services — quality customer relations, billing, and default prevention and collection — and still achieve Obama’s goal of saving taxpayers money.

FFELP lenders say such dually-beneficial partnerships are possible, which can be evidenced by a compromise that Congress approved last year that allows FFELP lenders to originate student loans using federal money and to resell the loans back to the government. FFELP lenders, which provide more than $56 billion of the nation’s federal student loans, were able to continue making loans to families and the government was able to ensure that families still had access to federal student loans.

But the savings Sallie Mae projects under its compromise plan still only add up to about 82 percent of the president’s savings goal over the next five years.

Supporters of the president’s plan say that this savings shortfall, as well as the fact that FFELP lenders are still relying on the government’s help to retain lending capital, raises the question, “why do we even need private lenders,” asked Representative Timothy Bishop, D–N.Y., a former provost of Southampton College.

Bishop argues that expanding the Direct Loan Program, which provides federal student loan funds directly to more than 1,500 schools is “obvious and long overdue,” being that over the last few decades private lenders have earned huge profits at relatively no risk because the government guarantees repayment up to 97 percent.

Factional In-Fighting Could Favor Lenders

In addition to battling lenders, lawmakers are also fighting an internal battle. Republicans say Obama’s plan is just another means to expand government control over the private sector, while Democrats are divided, with some legislators favoring the plan while others, who represent districts that rely heavily on student loan providers for employment, are siding with private lenders.

Allen Boyd, D–Fla., argues that the president’s proposal could jeopardize thousands of jobs across the country, including 650 in his own district, at a time when unemployment is already rampant. And the states that administer loans through state-based guarantee agencies, considered quasi-government entities that benefit the same as private lenders, are fighting to retain their lending business.

To help keep these quasi-government agencies afloat if they lose their FFELP business, the Obama administration has proposed spending $500 million a year on these agencies’ financial literacy programs and services.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Federal Student Loan Lenders Fight for Survival

Student Loan Girl — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:52:00 GMT

In what is being viewed as a direct hit to private third-party lenders in the Federal Family Education Loan Program who are fighting to keep the program alive, the U.S. Department of Education’s preliminary data paints the FFEL program as a costly and ineffective system with a 7.3-percent student loan default rate, two whole points higher than the default rate for the Direct Loan Program (“Private Lenders Brace for Fight Over Student-Loan Role,” The Wall Street Journal, March 27, 2009).

Since its launch in the 1960s, FFELP has been the primary source of federal student loans. This year the FFEL program has already lent more than $56 billion in student loans, while the Direct Loan Program has lent just $20 billion. But President Obama has proposed axing the FFEL program, which costs the federal government billions of dollars in subsidies each year, in favor of the government’s Direct Loan Program, through which families borrow directly from the government.

FFELP lenders have said that the Education Department’s untimely release of the student loan default rate data — taken from fiscal year 2007 — was purely political since the government has never released preliminary default rate data and has never broken down the data by the two programs. Industry analysts say the data reflects the differences in the two programs: FFELP lenders typically cater to more students from for-profit schools who tend to default at a higher rate than students in the Direct Loan Program.

Department of Education officials have said they released the data in response to a U.S. Freedom of Information Act request from The Wall Street Journal and inquiries from Congressional leaders.

“It’s unfortunate the rates are being released before there is an analysis of them,” said Brett Lief, president of the National Council of Higher Education Loan Programs, a trade group that represents FFELP lenders and federal loan guarantee agencies. “This is very serious stuff and I’m saddened that it has come out like this.”

No Cut-and-Dry Solution to the FFELP Dilemma

While the Consumer Bankers Association, which represents certain FFELP lenders, has sent Congress a 2,500-signature petition asking legislators to reject the president’s proposal to eliminate the FFEL program, industry observers don’t see the battle over FFELP ending quickly or simply.

The Congressional Budget Office has said eliminating the program would save the government nearly $100 billion over the next 10 years, which President Obama plans to redirect to the Federal Pell Grant program. This potential funding boost for Pell Grants, which are awarded to the nation’s neediest students, could make it harder for legislators who support FFELP to successfully argue to keep the program alive.

However, some legislators who oppose the FFEL program face strong opposition from their home-state guarantee agencies that work with FFELP lenders to service college loans for students in their state. Legislators may also have to battle student loan giant Sallie Mae, which has said that keeping certain elements of FFELP might actually make it possible for the government to draw additional Pell Grant funding from FFELP itself. Sallie Mae has also pointed out that its borrowers, who partake in default prevention programs through state loan-guarantee agencies, are 30 percent less likely to default than direct loan borrowers.

“It’s certainly possible Congress would eliminate the program,” said Terry Hartle, a senior vice president of the American Council of Education, a trade group representing colleges and universities. “But it’s equally possible — and perhaps more so — to wring more savings out of the [FFEL] program and put the savings into Pell.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

House Dems Get Second Crack at Higher Education Appropriations Bill

Student Loan Girl — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:23:00 GMT

Just days after President Obama signed a $787 billion economic stimulus bill into law, House Democrats have reintroduced a $410 billion overdue appropriations measure that would finance dozens of federal agencies and programs, including many related to higher education, whose budgets went unapproved during the last session of Congress, reports The Chronicle of Higher Education (“Delayed Appropriations Bill Would Increase Pell Grant and Research Funds,” Feb. 24, 2009).

During the tail end of the Bush administration, democratic lawmakers chose to put the original appropriations bill on the back burner after President Bush threatened to veto any measure that would exceed his fiscal budget. Instead, legislators passed a “continuing resolution” to fund the budgetless organizations at fiscal 2008 levels through March 6, so that legislators could revisit the appropriations bill under a new administration.

Lawmakers, after being delayed by work on the stimulus bill, are finally taking a second look at the appropriations bill just days before the continuing resolution’s termination date and President Obama’s scheduled release of his fiscal year 2010 budget.

The proposed spending bill will “keep the government running and finish last year’s business,” said David Obey D-Wis., head of the House Appropriations Committee, as wells as complement the Obama administration’s economic recovery package.

While the proposed budget measure will provide expanded funding to a variety of agencies and programs, it currently offers few specific financing details. The Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education could get $133.7 million to fund projects intended to model improvements to college education and accessibility, the Gear Up program could get $313.2 million to help financially needy middle and high school students prepare for college, and the government’s student financial aid programs could get a $19.2 billion boost.

The House Appropriations Committee bill would also expand research funding for the National Institutes of Health by $938 million, and provide an additional $347 million in funding to the Federal Pell Grant Program, drawing on the budget previously allocated for the underutilized, and Bush administration-supported, Academic Competitiveness and National Science and Mathematics Access to Retain Talent grant programs.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Revised Federal Reserve Plan Could Boost Student Loan Lending

Student Loan Girl — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:52:00 GMT

Student loan lenders and holders of student loan securities are set to be among the beneficiaries of a $1 trillion government plan unveiled by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner this week to jump-start the credit markets and encourage private sector lending, CNNMoney reports (“$1 Trillion To Boost Lending,” Feb. 10, 2009).

As part of the Consumer & Business Lending Initiative, an expansion of the Bush administration’s $200 billion Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, the Federal Reserve will commit an additional $100 billion to be used for the purchase of top-rated securities backed by debt, including student loans, auto loans, small business loans, and credit cards. The Obama administration said the program could deliver as much as $1 trillion to public and private sectors to revitalize lending.

Despite skepticism from analysts about the program’s potential to boost activity in the credit markets, Geithner emphasized that the plan is one part of the two key components needed for economic recovery to take effect. The other component would be addressed by the Obama administration’s stimulus bill if it passes.

“It is essential for every American to understand that the battle for economic recovery must be fought on two fronts,” Geithner said. “We have to both jump-start job creation and private investment and we must get credit flowing again to businesses and families.”

The Federal Reserve will use the $100 billion it has committed to the program to offer loans to investors in exchange for securitized collateral — student loan debt included. Investors would be required to provide the Fed with a small portion of the total cost of the securities upfront, before being able to receive the loan from the Fed to buy the securities.

CNNMoney explains, for example, that if a bank issues a batch of securities worth $1,000, a hedge fund investor could give the Federal Reserve $50 in return for a $950 loan that the hedge fund investor would use to buy the bank’s securities. The bank would then recoup its $1,000 investment in the securities, enabling it to make new loans, while the hedge fund would get a new infusion of cash that would have the potential to increase in value if the security’s value goes up.

If the program succeeds in helping to unfreeze the credit markets, which Scott Hoyt, senior director of consumer economics at Moody’s Economy.com says “it certainly has the potential” to do, it may encourage more lenders to return to the student loan market and it may allow student loan lenders to be able to loosen their credit requirements for lending, making it easier for more students to qualify for college loans.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Colleges Want Piece of Federal Government’s “Bailout Pie”

Student Loan Girl — Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:17:00 GMT

With 39 states anticipating budget shortfalls next year totaling more than $100 billion, colleges are urging Congress to include them in a second economic stimulus bill currently being drafted, The Chronicle of Higher Education reports (“As the Economic Crisis Hits Home, Colleges Seek Help From Congress,” Nov. 13, 2008).

Hard hit by the deteriorating economy and financial markets, many schools are dealing with declining endowments, reduced support from the state, and higher numbers of financially needy students. To help schools overcome these challenges, college lobbyists are asking Congress to include funds for financial aid, research, and infrastructure as part of the new economic-stimulus bill.

The Association of American Universities and the American Association of Medical Colleges are specifically lobbying Congress for more money for research, emphasizing the ways colleges support the economy by creating new jobs, graduating work-ready students, and promoting business development.

In a recent letter from the AAMC quantifying its claims, the organization stated that medical colleges were responsible for about 3 million jobs, $20 billion in state tax revenue and injected $451 billion into the economy last year.

Billions Requested by College Associations

Many college associations representing a wide array of interests have petitioned Congress for several billion dollars, each for distinct purposes:

The AAMC is requesting $1.9 billion for the National Institutes of Health.
The American Association of State Colleges and Universities and the Student Aid Alliance are asking for more than $5 billion to make up for a projected shortfall in Pell Grant funding and for Congress to provide enough funding to meet a recently passed $500 increase to the maximum Pell Grant award.
The Association of American Universities wants bailout money set aside for campus construction projects that have halted across the nation.

In their pursuit of funds, schools are competing with state governments, as well as the ailing airline and auto industries. And with the transfer of power on January 20, 2009 from the current Bush administration to the Obama administration, schools may have to wait until February or later to see if they get the capital infusion they seek.

With so many urgent needs confronting Congress — including the possible collapse of Ford, Chrysler and GM, and the loss of millions of jobs if the automakers don’t receive $25 billion in emergency government loans — colleges realize that they aren’t likely a top priority to receive government aid, the Chronicle suggests.

Cynthia Littlefield, director of federal relations at the Association of Jesuit Colleges and Universities said, “There are so many people going to the trough who have legitimate needs that it’s going to be hard.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit