Student Loan Blog : Mark Kantrowitz

‘Gap Loans’ at For-Profit Colleges Escape Proposed Legislation

Student Loan Girl — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:47:00 GMT

While acting last Thursday to approve the creation of a Consumer Financial Protection Agency, which will expand federal oversight of private student loans, a Congressional panel at the same time voted to reject a proposal that would have included school-sponsored “gap loans” under the authority of the new CFPA.

The House Financial Services Committee, in a vote of 39 to 29, approved the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act of 2009 (H.R. 3126), a centerpiece of the Obama administration’s pursuit to overhaul the nation’s financial regulatory system. The approved legislation would create a new federal agency, the CFPA, which would have the authority to write new consumer protection rules in the arenas of lending and credit, including private student loans (“House Panel Moves to Regulate Private Student Loans,” Oct. 26, 2009).

Gap loans, however, could potentially be exempted from the CFPA’s oversight due to language included in the bill meant to shield small businesses and local merchants that extend credit to their customers. A proposed amendment to the CFPA Act that would have clarified that gap loans are subject to CFPA regulation was narrowly defeated in the House committee by a vote of 35 to 33.

Gap Financing on the Rise at For-Profit Schools

“Gap” student loans — so-called because they’re intended to cover students’ financing gaps, any college costs that aren’t covered by a student’s financial aid (scholarships, grants, federal student loans) — are increasingly being offered by for-profit colleges and vocational schools to boost enrollment as these institutions encounter a swelling influx of unemployed and low-income students looking to return to school to obtain a higher-earning degree, learn a new trade, or acquire additional training for their résumé.

“Because the economic meltdown has made it harder for students to get bank loans, several of these schools are increasingly stepping in, financing degrees in the same way a furniture store or used-car dealer might extend credit to customers,” explains Justin Pope, an education writer for The Associated Press (“For-Profit Colleges’ Increased Lending Prompts Concerns,” Aug. 15, 2009).

For-profit schools, also known as “proprietary” colleges, that provide gap financing, which include national heavyweights ITT Technical Institutes, Corinthian Colleges, and Career Education Corp., say that their financing programs allow students to attend school who wouldn’t otherwise be able to afford a college education.

But these gap financing programs are risky and expensive for students, consumer advocates maintain. Gap loans typically carry high interest rates, sometimes in the double digits, and large monthly payments that the schools’ generally low-income students often aren’t able to handle — all while allowing the schools to reap hundreds of thousands of dollars in federal money from the federal financial aid that students use to pay the bulk of their attendance costs.

“I believe we have an obligation to ensure that these schools are not allowed to continue to prey on students,” said Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., who sponsored the defeated CFPA amendment. “By subjecting these schools to CFPA’s authority, the quality of the student loans these schools provide will improve” (“House Panel Approves Expanded Oversight of Private Student Loans,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, Oct. 22, 2009).

Consumer Groups Push for Regulation of Gap Financing

Consumer and student advocate groups, concerned about the potential for student loans made by proprietary schools to be exempted from the CFPA legislation under the bill’s small-business clause, had been lobbying in support of the Waters-sponsored amendment to explicitly bring gap loans under the authority of the CFPA.

“We just want to make sure that the risky financial products that some colleges, for-profits in particular, have been making to students are still covered by this agency, and not undercut by a well-intentioned suggestion of how to make sure that the neighborhood grocer isn’t unfairly and unduly impacted” by increased regulation, said Lauren Asher, president of The Institute for College Access & Success (“Regulating Private Student Loans,” Inside Higher Ed, Oct. 19, 2009).

Asher and TICAS joined a number of other consumer and student advocacy groups in drafting a letter earlier this month to Rep. Barney Frank, the Democratic chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, urging the committee to clarify that school-sponsored loans wouldn’t be shielded from the CFPA’s reach (letter to Rep. Barney Frank regarding H.R. 3126, Oct. 7, 2009).

“To effectively protect consumers, the CFPA must have full authority to regulate private student loans regardless of the institution offering them,” the groups wrote. “For consumers, a private student loan can pose the same serious risks whether issued by a financial institution or by a school. The CFPA should apply and enforce standards based upon the product and not the issuing institution.”

Gap Loans vs. Gap ‘Financing’: The Non–Student Loan

Proprietary colleges argued against the Waters amendment, saying that gap student loans are already regulated by the federal Truth in Lending Act.

New TILA rules, mandated under last year’s Higher Education Opportunity Act (H.R. 4137) and which will go into effect in February, will require student lenders to disclose more details about their private loan programs, including interest rates and estimated monthly payments, and to inform applicants for private student loans about federal student loan options.

Consumer advocates, however, hold that TILA regulations aren’t sufficient and that the stricter oversight of the CFPA is necessary in order to protect student loan borrowers.

In pushing for the Waters amendment, consumer and student advocacy groups pointed to the move being made by some schools to offer their gap funding under the auspices of “consumer financing” rather than as a student loan program. By structuring their gap funding programs as consumer financing rather than as private student loans, schools are able to skirt the student loan–specific requirements, regulations, and borrower disclosures mandated by the Higher Education Opportunity Act.

“It’s very alarming,” said Deanne Loonin, director of student loan borrower assistance project at the National Consumer Law Center. Schools “can structure the products in all kinds of ways — things like revolving credit lines, unsecured loans, even secured loans. It’s this new thing, and we’re worried about it.”

One for-profit school, Colorado-based Westwood College, is currently defending itself against a class-action lawsuit brought by students accusing the school of fraud in its student financing. The lawsuit charges Westwood with violating state banking laws. Westwood’s student financing program carries a relatively high interest rate of 18 percent, but the school doesn’t call its financing student loans.

The For-Profit Risk

Students at proprietary colleges are particularly vulnerable to the schools’ high-interest loans and financing programs, consumer and student groups say, because of who these students are: lower-income, higher-risk borrowers.

Low-income students, who tend to drop out of college in greater numbers than higher-income students, generally end up struggling to repay their student loans. And for-profit colleges, with their student populations that skew toward lower income levels, on average have lower graduation rates and higher loan default rates than other schools.

In 2007–08, students at proprietary colleges defaulted on their student loans at a rate of 11.1 percent, according to the Department of Education, compared to a default rate of 6.0 percent for students at public nonprofit colleges and universities and a rate of 3.8 percent for students at private nonprofit institutions.

Students at for-profit schools are also taking on increasingly higher debt loads: The percentage of proprietary college students borrowing at least $40,000 nearly tripled to 30 percent between 2003–04 and 2007–08, says Mark Kantrowitz, founder of the financial aid website, FinAid.org. The proportion of proprietary college students taking out private student loans has also come near to tripling, rising to 43 percent from 15 percent in that same time period, according to an analysis of federal data by the nonprofit group Education Sector.

Nonetheless, critics charge, as long as proprietary schools can continue to bring in significant federal funds with each student, the schools have little incentive to refine their lending practices to ensure that students aren’t taking on unmanageable debt.

“Consider, for example, a school charging $10,000, hoping to enroll a student who has lined up $9,000 in aid from the government and elsewhere,” writes Pope. “Even if the school loses half of the $1,000 it lends to get the student in the door, it comes out $9,000 ahead.”

And “for many of these students, if you don’t apply these thousand dollars, they’re not coming to school,” says Jeff Silber, an industry analyst with BMO Capital Markets.

From the school’s perspective, you’re realizing “all those other revenues,” he elaborates, “even if you write off $500 [of that $1,000] right away. … Financially it still makes sense to do this.”

And with last week’s defeat of the CFPA amendment, the stage is set for schools to press on with their gap financing programs, having sidestepped, at least for now, the impending shadow of the CFPA and increased federal oversight.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

FAFSA Discourages Students From Applying for Federal Loans

Student Loan Girl — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:10:00 GMT

A large proportion of students who only take out non-federal private student loans to finance their education aren’t applying for federal financial aid at all, and it’s the application itself that may be culprit, a new study suggests (“Nightmare Application May Be Driving Students to Costly Loans,” Forbes, June 9, 2009).

In his study of 250,000 students, Mark Kantrowitz, publisher of FinAid.org, a website that offers information on financial aid and student loans, found that since 1999, among those students who relied exclusively on private student loans, 60 percent of undergraduates and nearly 90 percent of graduate students didn’t complete the FAFSA, the Free Application for Federal Student Aid.

The number of students who only take out private student loans has increased 27 percent over the last 10 years. Between 2007 and 2008, the private loans taken out by students who forwent their federal financial aid options amounted to $6.2 billion — nearly 30 percent of the $22.5 billion in new private student loans originated that year.

Proposed Changes Would Eliminate FAFSA

The study’s findings come at a pivotal time in the FAFSA’s history, as the U.S. Department of Education weighs two proposals to overhaul the federal financial aid application process, one of which would carry out President Obama’s campaign promise to eliminate the FAFSA completely.

The FAFSA — currently the only way for families to apply for federal financial aid for college and graduate school — advertises itself as requiring only one hour to complete. But the six-page application calls for families to provide information about their adjusted gross income, marital status, value of their personal property, and taxable income — hurdles, Kantrowitz says, that “may deter students from applying for federal aid.”

A revamp of the FAFSA or of the application process itself could encourage more students to apply for federal student loans, which are typically less costly than private student loans, generally offering lower, fixed interest rates and more flexible repayment terms.

One proposal being considered would simplify the financial aid application form to require only adjusted gross income figures and tax exemption numbers. The other plan that’s been suggested would eliminate an application form altogether and allow the Internal Revenue Service to pass on information from financial aid applicants’ tax returns directly to the Department of Education.

Kantrowitz says a change in the financial aid application process may, in particular, help students from low-income families. His study found that low-income students have been more likely to end up turning to private student loans, which will generally cost them more than federal college loans would: Students from families who earn less than $50,000 a year accounted for two-thirds of those borrowers who financed their education solely with private loans.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Experts Recommend: Fill Out Your FAFSA Early

Student Loan Girl — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:37:00 GMT

Students who want to maximize their federal financial aid for the 2009–10 academic year should fill out their FAFSA (Free Application for Federal Student Aid) this week — the first week applications are accepted, reports The Baltimore Sun (“Ringing in the New Year With FAFSA Might Be a Good Move for 2009,” Dec. 30, 2009).

“The sooner you get [the FAFSA] done, the better,” says Mark Kantrowitz, publisher of FinAid, a financial aid website.

Since many states and colleges use the FAFSA to determine how to allocate their funds and some schools have early admissions deadlines, students who complete their application sooner rather than later may have a better chance of getting federal financial aid. Schools often have two separate financial aid funds, each with their own deadlines, and make more money available to families who met the earlier deadline, Kantrowitz says.

He recommends that families should always fill out the FAFSA even if they think they make too much money to qualify for need-based financial aid; a family making $100,000 or more could still qualify for federal and state aid to attend an expensive institution.

Resources to Get Started

Find out how to fill out your FAFSA online.

Use the FAFSA4caster at www.fafsa4caster.ed.gov to calculate how much financial aid you may qualify for and to get tips on how to reduce the time it takes you to complete your FAFSA.

Call the Federal Student Aid Information Center for free at 1-800-433-3243 if you need help with your application.

Go to www.finaid.org for tips on how to maximize the need-based aid you could receive.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Citibank Suspends Student Loan Program for International Students

Student Loan Girl — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 01:04:00 GMT

Citibank announced it is canceling its private student loan program for international students in an effort to minimize its financial risk during the global financial crisis, Bloomberg reports (“Citigroup Curbs Foreign-Student Loans at Harvard, MIT, Michigan,” Oct. 15, 2008).

The lender’s CitiAssist private student loan program allowed international students at certain schools to borrow as much as $150,000 in private student loans without a cosigner; similar programs required that international borrowers have a U.S. citizen or permanent resident cosign on the loans.

Citibank informed MIT and the University of Michigan this month that it will stop making CitiAssist loans to the schools’ international students in November, just before students begin borrowing for the 2009–2010 academic year. Earlier this month, the bank also terminated its international lending program at Harvard University.

CitiAssist “did fill a very important role,” says Elizabeth Hicks, executive director of student financial services at MIT, where more than 200 of the school’s foreign students at the Sloan School of Management will have fewer borrowing options to help them meet their education costs, which total nearly $76,000.

International Student Loans Drying Up, More Banks Unwilling to Lend

In suspending its lending program to international students, Citibank joins Bank of America, one of the largest providers of student loans to foreign students, which terminated its foreign student lending program in April.

Other lenders are not likely to fill in the lending gap to international students, due, in part, to the fact that international students have a higher likelihood of default than U.S. students and because loans to “international students are not the most profitable loans,” says Mark Kantrowitz, publisher of Finaid.org, a financial aid website sponsored by Citibank’s parent company Citigroup.

Analyst Daniello Natoli, of New York-based financial firm Matrix USA, adds, “It makes sense for [Citibank] to move away from riskier products such as loans to international students, whose creditworthiness is more difficult to assess.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

NextStudent to Be Spotlighted at Largest Virtual College Fair

Student Loan Girl — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:06:00 GMT

Don Fenstermaker, the founder and CEO of NextStudent, will join noted names Mark Kantrowitz, publisher of FinAid.org, and Kim Clark, senior writer for U.S. World & News Report, as one of only a few financial aid experts to give a live streaming video keynote presentation on college financing at today’s CollegeWeekLive event.

CollegeWeekLive, the largest virtual college fair on the Web, is hosting its “Paying for College” event today as a free online resource for students and parents looking for information on college financing and the financial aid process.

Fenstermaker’s presentation, “Paying for College A–Z,” will be streamed live from his NextStudent office in Phoenix, Ariz., and NextStudent’s professional Education Finance Advisors will be on-hand to interact directly with students and parents, discussing their college financing options, answering questions about parent and student loans, and offering guidance on where to find the financial resources that can help families cover all their college costs.

CollegeWeekLive participants are also invited to visit NextStudent’s virtual booths and watch spotlight video presentations on the company’s free online scholarship database, its flagship private student loan program, and its popular NextPath blogs for students, graduates, and parents.

From any NextStudent booth, attendees can connect directly to the NextStudent website, chat live with a NextStudent Education Finance Advisor, search over $16 billion in available scholarships, and apply free for a private student loan.

The fair kicks off at 10 a.m. Eastern today and runs until 8 p.m. Admission is free, and students and parents can still register online through the CollegeWeekLive website.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Credit Unions Offer Themselves as Partial Solution to Looming Student Loan Crisis

Student Loan Girl — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:19:00 GMT

In the last six months alone, since legislators eliminated over $21 billion in subsidies to student loan lenders in the Federal Family Education Loan Program, at least 44 FFELP lenders have stopped originating federal student loans.

This exodus of lenders from the federal student loan program, combined with the current credit and liquidity crunch resulting from an epidemic of defaulted mortgages, may leave many college students scrambling for money for school this fall.

In an effort to help avoid a student loan crisis before it starts, a group of credit unions serving students in California, Texas, and Wisconsin is lobbying for federal subsidies that would allow credit unions to provide significantly more loan capital for students.

Last September, federal legislation set two lender subsidy rates on federally guaranteed student loans, one rate that applies to for-profit lenders and a second for state-chartered nonprofit agencies, explains Paul Basken of The Chronicle of Higher Education.

When those rates were set, credit unions, which are essentially nonprofit banks, were left out of the picture, neither subject to the for-profit lender rate nor eligible for the nonprofit rate which is guaranteed only to state-chartered lenders.

Now, writes Basken, as more for-profit bank and nonbank lenders abandon the FFEL program each week, the credit unions seek legislation that would make them eligible for the nonprofit subsidy rate (“Credit Unions Will Lobby Congress for Loan-Subsidy Benefits Accorded to Nonprofit Lenders,” April 4, 2008).

A Viable Source for More Student Loans?

Credit unions currently provide less than 1 percent of all FFELP loans, according to Mark Kantrowitz, publisher of FinAid.org, a financial aid website.

However, credit unions could offer significantly more volume at some institutions, Michael K. Kim, vice president for student services at the USC Credit Union, told The Chronicle.

The USC Credit Union provided 30 percent of all federal student loans at the University of Southern California last year, and Kim believes the USC Credit Union could double its student loan lending to $200 million to provide financing for any students unable to find another lender.

Although Kim thinks the credit union might find a way to double its student loans even without the nonprofit subsidy, the nonprofit rate would help.

One of the key selling points in the credit unions’ lobbying efforts, Basken writes, may be the fact that credit unions have a ready pool of capital — their customer deposits — from which to lend. In contrast, nonbank lenders, who don’t hold funding capital, must find external funding sources for their student loans and thus have been more vulnerable to the liquidity crisis that’s followed the fallout in mortgage lending.

Joining Kim’s Southern California credit-union group in lobbying Congress next week for the nonprofit subsidy rate are the UW Credit Union, serving universities in Wisconsin, and the University Federal Credit Union, which serves more than 100 colleges and employers in central Texas.

More, but Still Not Enough

An advisor from Senator Edward Kennedy’s office recently expressed support for the credit unions’ request that their proposal for inclusion in the nonprofit subsidy rate be added to the legislation for reauthorization of the Higher Education Act currently before Congress.

Kantrowitz believes that the credit unions’ subsidy proposal is reasonable since they’re nonprofit entities whose earnings don’t benefit outside investors.

On the other hand, he says, the additional loan volume credit unions could provide for the federally backed student loan program will likely not be enough to staunch the tide of students that may potentially be unable to find lenders this fall.

Kantrowitz further points out that among the 100 largest lenders in the federal student loan program, only three are credit unions.

“If credit unions can double their volume, that’s a 5-percent solution,” Kantrowitz says. “It could be part of the solution, but not even close to the entire solution.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit