Student Loan Blog : Justin Pope

‘Gap Loans’ at For-Profit Colleges Escape Proposed Legislation

Student Loan Girl — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:47:00 GMT

While acting last Thursday to approve the creation of a Consumer Financial Protection Agency, which will expand federal oversight of private student loans, a Congressional panel at the same time voted to reject a proposal that would have included school-sponsored “gap loans” under the authority of the new CFPA.

The House Financial Services Committee, in a vote of 39 to 29, approved the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act of 2009 (H.R. 3126), a centerpiece of the Obama administration’s pursuit to overhaul the nation’s financial regulatory system. The approved legislation would create a new federal agency, the CFPA, which would have the authority to write new consumer protection rules in the arenas of lending and credit, including private student loans (“House Panel Moves to Regulate Private Student Loans,” Oct. 26, 2009).

Gap loans, however, could potentially be exempted from the CFPA’s oversight due to language included in the bill meant to shield small businesses and local merchants that extend credit to their customers. A proposed amendment to the CFPA Act that would have clarified that gap loans are subject to CFPA regulation was narrowly defeated in the House committee by a vote of 35 to 33.

Gap Financing on the Rise at For-Profit Schools

“Gap” student loans — so-called because they’re intended to cover students’ financing gaps, any college costs that aren’t covered by a student’s financial aid (scholarships, grants, federal student loans) — are increasingly being offered by for-profit colleges and vocational schools to boost enrollment as these institutions encounter a swelling influx of unemployed and low-income students looking to return to school to obtain a higher-earning degree, learn a new trade, or acquire additional training for their résumé.

“Because the economic meltdown has made it harder for students to get bank loans, several of these schools are increasingly stepping in, financing degrees in the same way a furniture store or used-car dealer might extend credit to customers,” explains Justin Pope, an education writer for The Associated Press (“For-Profit Colleges’ Increased Lending Prompts Concerns,” Aug. 15, 2009).

For-profit schools, also known as “proprietary” colleges, that provide gap financing, which include national heavyweights ITT Technical Institutes, Corinthian Colleges, and Career Education Corp., say that their financing programs allow students to attend school who wouldn’t otherwise be able to afford a college education.

But these gap financing programs are risky and expensive for students, consumer advocates maintain. Gap loans typically carry high interest rates, sometimes in the double digits, and large monthly payments that the schools’ generally low-income students often aren’t able to handle — all while allowing the schools to reap hundreds of thousands of dollars in federal money from the federal financial aid that students use to pay the bulk of their attendance costs.

“I believe we have an obligation to ensure that these schools are not allowed to continue to prey on students,” said Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., who sponsored the defeated CFPA amendment. “By subjecting these schools to CFPA’s authority, the quality of the student loans these schools provide will improve” (“House Panel Approves Expanded Oversight of Private Student Loans,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, Oct. 22, 2009).

Consumer Groups Push for Regulation of Gap Financing

Consumer and student advocate groups, concerned about the potential for student loans made by proprietary schools to be exempted from the CFPA legislation under the bill’s small-business clause, had been lobbying in support of the Waters-sponsored amendment to explicitly bring gap loans under the authority of the CFPA.

“We just want to make sure that the risky financial products that some colleges, for-profits in particular, have been making to students are still covered by this agency, and not undercut by a well-intentioned suggestion of how to make sure that the neighborhood grocer isn’t unfairly and unduly impacted” by increased regulation, said Lauren Asher, president of The Institute for College Access & Success (“Regulating Private Student Loans,” Inside Higher Ed, Oct. 19, 2009).

Asher and TICAS joined a number of other consumer and student advocacy groups in drafting a letter earlier this month to Rep. Barney Frank, the Democratic chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, urging the committee to clarify that school-sponsored loans wouldn’t be shielded from the CFPA’s reach (letter to Rep. Barney Frank regarding H.R. 3126, Oct. 7, 2009).

“To effectively protect consumers, the CFPA must have full authority to regulate private student loans regardless of the institution offering them,” the groups wrote. “For consumers, a private student loan can pose the same serious risks whether issued by a financial institution or by a school. The CFPA should apply and enforce standards based upon the product and not the issuing institution.”

Gap Loans vs. Gap ‘Financing’: The Non–Student Loan

Proprietary colleges argued against the Waters amendment, saying that gap student loans are already regulated by the federal Truth in Lending Act.

New TILA rules, mandated under last year’s Higher Education Opportunity Act (H.R. 4137) and which will go into effect in February, will require student lenders to disclose more details about their private loan programs, including interest rates and estimated monthly payments, and to inform applicants for private student loans about federal student loan options.

Consumer advocates, however, hold that TILA regulations aren’t sufficient and that the stricter oversight of the CFPA is necessary in order to protect student loan borrowers.

In pushing for the Waters amendment, consumer and student advocacy groups pointed to the move being made by some schools to offer their gap funding under the auspices of “consumer financing” rather than as a student loan program. By structuring their gap funding programs as consumer financing rather than as private student loans, schools are able to skirt the student loan–specific requirements, regulations, and borrower disclosures mandated by the Higher Education Opportunity Act.

“It’s very alarming,” said Deanne Loonin, director of student loan borrower assistance project at the National Consumer Law Center. Schools “can structure the products in all kinds of ways — things like revolving credit lines, unsecured loans, even secured loans. It’s this new thing, and we’re worried about it.”

One for-profit school, Colorado-based Westwood College, is currently defending itself against a class-action lawsuit brought by students accusing the school of fraud in its student financing. The lawsuit charges Westwood with violating state banking laws. Westwood’s student financing program carries a relatively high interest rate of 18 percent, but the school doesn’t call its financing student loans.

The For-Profit Risk

Students at proprietary colleges are particularly vulnerable to the schools’ high-interest loans and financing programs, consumer and student groups say, because of who these students are: lower-income, higher-risk borrowers.

Low-income students, who tend to drop out of college in greater numbers than higher-income students, generally end up struggling to repay their student loans. And for-profit colleges, with their student populations that skew toward lower income levels, on average have lower graduation rates and higher loan default rates than other schools.

In 2007–08, students at proprietary colleges defaulted on their student loans at a rate of 11.1 percent, according to the Department of Education, compared to a default rate of 6.0 percent for students at public nonprofit colleges and universities and a rate of 3.8 percent for students at private nonprofit institutions.

Students at for-profit schools are also taking on increasingly higher debt loads: The percentage of proprietary college students borrowing at least $40,000 nearly tripled to 30 percent between 2003–04 and 2007–08, says Mark Kantrowitz, founder of the financial aid website, FinAid.org. The proportion of proprietary college students taking out private student loans has also come near to tripling, rising to 43 percent from 15 percent in that same time period, according to an analysis of federal data by the nonprofit group Education Sector.

Nonetheless, critics charge, as long as proprietary schools can continue to bring in significant federal funds with each student, the schools have little incentive to refine their lending practices to ensure that students aren’t taking on unmanageable debt.

“Consider, for example, a school charging $10,000, hoping to enroll a student who has lined up $9,000 in aid from the government and elsewhere,” writes Pope. “Even if the school loses half of the $1,000 it lends to get the student in the door, it comes out $9,000 ahead.”

And “for many of these students, if you don’t apply these thousand dollars, they’re not coming to school,” says Jeff Silber, an industry analyst with BMO Capital Markets.

From the school’s perspective, you’re realizing “all those other revenues,” he elaborates, “even if you write off $500 [of that $1,000] right away. … Financially it still makes sense to do this.”

And with last week’s defeat of the CFPA amendment, the stage is set for schools to press on with their gap financing programs, having sidestepped, at least for now, the impending shadow of the CFPA and increased federal oversight.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Gloomiest Job Outlook for New Grads in 25 Years

Student Loan Girl — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:20:00 GMT

Recent college graduates face one of the worst job markets in years, making the prospect of finding a job that much more daunting at a time when America is experiencing the highest unemployment rate in a quarter century.

Landing a job may be even more difficult, according to a survey by the National Association of Colleges and Employers, since companies have indicated they plan to hire 22 percent fewer graduates this spring (“College Grads Face Worst Job Market in Years,” The Associated Press, March 31, 2009).

But that may not be the worst of the job shortage, says Sheila Curran, former head of career services at Duke University. Curran says that employers, particularly those that offer entry-level positions in April and May “just in time” to hire newly minted college graduates, may actually be looking to hire far fewer graduates than the survey indicates. However, the full extent of how much employers will pull back from hiring for these “just-in-time” positions — which account for 80 percent of jobs for new grads — may not be known until later this fall.

Despite a dismal job outlook for new graduates, career counselors say there are still some bright spots in certain industries.

Graduates looking for a job in the healthcare field are still in demand, and graduates looking for a career in finance may find jobs are still available, since small regional companies are stepping up their recruiting efforts on college campuses while larger firms in New York and elsewhere are downsizing, the Associated Press reports.

Surprisingly, one of the biggest potential employers for graduates this spring may be the federal government, which recently posted some 46,000 job openings on its website, including positions for budget analysts, historians, and firefighters.

Students Learning to Persevere as They Expand Their Networks

Career counselors say one good thing to come out of this tightened job market is that many students are being forced to develop better job-search skills than in years past when jobs were more readily available.

“In a sense it's like, ‘Welcome to the real world,’ and it’s not a bad thing,” said Elizabeth Alexander, manager of marketing and program evaluation for the career services center at the University of Texas at Austin’s College of Liberal Arts. “If you come out of college thinking, ‘I’m entitled to a great job,’ the first time you get laid off, it’s going to come as a great shock. Life is full of peaks and troughs.”

New graduates, who will likely change jobs three times within five years of graduation, are learning valuable job-search skills that will help them persevere later in their careers, suggests the Associated Press.

“Where we’re seeing a difference this year is [that students] have to do the right things over and over again,” said Teresa Olsen, associate director of career services at Colgate University. “It’s not just reaching out to two or three contacts. They have to keep coming back.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Students Could Save $40,000 by Completing College Degree in 3 Years

Student Loan Girl — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:31:00 GMT

Students attending Hartwick College in New York may now be able to save over $40,000 on their education by enrolling in a new three- year college degree program, according to a recent news release from the college (“Hartwick College Announces Three-Year Bachelor’s Degree,” Feb. 24, 2009).

The new initiative will reduce colleges costs for the school’s students and their families by 25 percent at a time when the country remains deeply mired in a recession, but, Hartwick officials contend, the program will maintain the “rich educational experience” that is characteristic of the school.

“This three-year program will deliver the same educational opportunity to qualifying students as our four-year program,” said Dr. Margaret Drugovich, Hartwick’s president. “We believe it is imperative for the higher education community to preserve the option of a top-quality education for any student who seeks it, regardless of the prevailing economic challenges or personal circumstances.”

To qualify for the three-year college degree program, students must have graduated high school with at least a 3.0 GPA. Once enrolled, students must take 40 credits each academic year instead of the usual 30, and take classes during a special January term each year in order to complete the standard 120 credits needed to graduate. The required extra winter session will allow students to keep their summers free for study abroad, internships, research practicums, or spending time with family.

Increased Interest in Three-Year Programs

Drugovich is anticipating a great deal of interest in the three-year degree program, but her students aren’t the only ones taking notice of these types of programs. With the skyrocketing cost of college continuing to squeeze families often already hard-pressed to come up with money for school, the concept of a cheaper three-year degree may be gaining favor.

At the American Council on Education’s annual meeting held earlier this month, Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., a former university president, urged more college presidents to consider three-year college degrees at their institutions, the Associated Press reports (“Some Colleges Offering Degrees in 3 Years,” Feb. 24, 2009).

And lawmakers in Rhode Island are drafting legislation that would encourage three-year college degree completion. Their bill would create standardized college-level classes for the state’s high schools that would be intended to enable all students to complete college in only three years.

Three-Year Degrees Face Uncertain Future

But prior to the country’s recession, three-year degrees had largely failed to catch on.

At Upper Iowa University, only five students have chosen to pursue the school’s three-year degree program over the five years it has been in existence and every one of those five students ended up taking four or more years to complete their degree. The school has not had a single student interested in the program since.

Educators attribute the lack of participation in these accelerated programs to the fact that students may still prefer the full four- year college experience, academically, socially, and athletically, Joy Newcom, spokeswoman of Waldorf College, told the Associated Press about her Iowa school that is just now phasing out its last three-year program due to lack of student interest.

Newcom said, “What we’re finding they’re saying is, ‘Why did I want to grow up so fast?’ .”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Economy Takes Its Toll: Some Small Colleges to Shut Their Doors

Student Loan Girl — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:59:00 GMT

Americans could see more college closures, particularly among small schools with shrinking enrollment numbers as the slowing economy continues to claim more victims across every sector, The Associated Press reports (“College Closings Rare, but Could Rise in Downturn,” Nov, 17, 2008).

While the American Council on Education reported that only four out of 4,400 colleges closed in all of 2007, this year alone, four schools have announced they will either shut down certain branch campuses or close entirely by next school year.

Tuition costs that far exceed what state schools charge, diminishing enrollment numbers, and mounting debt loads have made it increasingly difficult for some small colleges, most notably those with religious affiliations, to stay afloat in recent years.

And now the same effects from the mishaps that took down the mortgage industry have bled into the higher education sector. Some schools may be discovering, much like many American consumers and homeowners, that the allure of low-interest loans caused them to take on more debt than they should have. The median debt of private colleges has increased 50 percent in the last five years, according to Moody’s Investors Service.

But now, like homeowners with variable-rate mortgages, some schools have seen their once low debt payments skyrocket to unmanageable proportions.

“Instead of holding long-term debt at lower interest rates, they have gotten stuck with short-term obligations at higher rates — a scenario [colleges] knew existed on paper but never expected to happen,” writes Justin Pope of The Associated Press.

Faith-Based Schools Hardest Hit by Economic Decline

Cascade College, a small Christian school in Portland, Ore. with just 280 students, announced it will be shutting down after the current academic year as it continues to struggle with a $4 million debt load. as will Pillsbury Baptist Bible College in Owatonna, Minn. and Vennard College in University Park, Iowa. Vennard, with just 80 students, will close its doors two years shy of its 100-year anniversary.

Taylor University in Indiana, another Christian institution, will shut down the undergraduate program at its Fort Wayne branch.

Paul Corts, president of the Council for Christian Colleges & Universities, said the financial crisis has become a “very serious” problem. “I think people are sensing that this is not short-term. It’s something that’s going to take a couple of years to play out.”

Enrollment at the council’s 102 member schools grew 71 percent between 1990 and 2004, and Corts said he doesn’t foresee that many of its schools will be closing.

He adds, however, that school closures may be difficult to predict because, “Nobody knows what the ultimate extent of this whole financial crisis is going to be.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit