Private Student Loans: Proceed With Caution

Student Loan Girl — Mon, 04 May 2009 21:07:00 GMT

Although the government has taken steps to bolster the federal student loan program by expanding Pell Grant awards and raising the maximum award amount of federal Stafford student loans, federal financial aid will still not be enough for many families to pay for college this year.

Grappling with stock market losses that have negatively affected 529 college savings plans and with declining home values that have essentially made home equity loans nonexistent, families of college students will likely have to rely more on private student loans, in addition to federal aid, this year to help pay for their education expenses, reports The New York Times (“Students’ First Lesson: Beware Loans’ Fine Print", May 2, 2009).

But the Times warns that private student loan borrowers need to be particularly cautious when applying for loans.

Private student loan lenders can set their own loan terms and aren’t required to inform their borrowers of the loans rates, fees, and terms. Citing data compiled by Student Lending Analytics, a company that helps schools analyze lending programs, the Times advises families applying for private student loans to weigh their options carefully and to take a close look at the fine print.

Interest Rates Vary From Lender to Lender

Unlike federal student loans, which have fixed interest rates, private student loans carry an average interest rate of 11 percent, according to Student Lending Analytics. However, lenders charge interest rates higher than 11 percent and, in some cases, won’t disclose the interest rate a borrower will be charged until after a borrower signs a promissory note.

Banks offer fixed-rate loans ranging from 7 percent to 12 percent, with big banks charging the highest rates. But at times, banks — particularly JPMorgan Chase, PNC Financial, and SunTrust Bank — hike up the rates on these loans by two to three percentage points if a borrower misses just one loan payment.

The variable-rate loans that private lenders offer can be tied to a specified interest rate index, like the prime rate, and their rates can vary depending on the changes to rate index. Chase, for example, charges interest as high as 13.5 percent on these loans.

Lenders Should Disclose All Fees

Tim Ranzetta, the founder of Student Lending Analytics, says lenders should be required to disclose any adjustments they make to an interest rate when a borrower misses a payment or when any other negative activity takes place on a borrower’s account.

Currently, lenders don’t disclose all the possible fees borrowers may be charged in the servicing and collection of their student loans, and lenders’ loan contracts don’t always inform borrowers of the borrower benefits promised in the lender advertisements, including the possibility of a borrower being charged a lower interest rate after graduation.

Ranzetta says, in addition to demanding that lenders fully disclose their loan terms, lenders should also be required to list their advertised benefits in the promissory note in order to contractually obligate lenders to offer their benefits.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Proposed Legislation Would Prevent Student Loan Lenders from ‘Cherry-Picking’ Schools They Lend To

Student Loan Girl — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:14:00 GMT

To ensure all students have access to student loans regardless of what type of school they attend, two Democratic senators introduced legislation Tuesday that would prohibit banks and other lenders from “picking and choosing” which institutions of higher education they do business with, according to a New York Times article (“Bill Promotes Universal College Loans,” June 18, 2008).

Under the proposal, lenders that participate in the Federal Family Education Loan Program would have to extend credit to any eligible student, regardless of a student’s income or the type of institution they attend, as long as the student’s college is a member of the FFEL program, writes Times reporter Jonathan Glater.

Senators Patty Murray, D-Wash., and Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., introduced the legislation in response to the decision of Citibank, JPMorgan Chase, PNC, and SunTrust to stop offering student loans to community colleges and other two-year institutions.

“Lenders offering loans backed by taxpayer dollars shouldn’t be able to discriminate against certain schools or students,” Murray said in a statement. “Denying loans based on school, program length, or income level locks the door for far too many.”

Bill Faces an Uncertain Future

Banks who have ceased lending to certain two-year institutions contend that they lose money on the loans. Schools that have been cut off by the banks tend to have higher default rates and fewer borrowers with small loan amounts — financial factors that, lenders say, make business at these schools less profitable.

But financial aid administrators counter that lenders should not be allowed to “cherry-pick,” because selective lending could make it harder for low-income students to pay for college.

The proposal, which is under review by the U.S. Department of Education, has already been met with controversy. Some financial aid officials support the measure as way of ensuring access to student loans, while others believe it might have the unintended consequence of pushing lenders out of the federal student-loan business altogether at time when over 100 lenders have already left the FFEL program.

While the bill’s prospects are unclear, Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, is expected to co-sponsor the bill.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Student Loan Blog : JPMorgan Chase, The New York Times

Private Student Loans: Proceed With Caution

Proposed Legislation Would Prevent Student Loan Lenders from ‘Cherry-Picking’ Schools They Lend To