Student Loan Blog : Direct Loan Program

Students’ College Access to Improve, Vice President Pledges

Student Loan Girl — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:50:00 GMT

Vice President Joe Biden intends to make higher education a reality for more young people, the Associated Press reports, in part by closing the gap between families’ incomes and rising college costs (“Biden Wants to Make Higher Ed More Affordable,” USA Today, April 18, 2009).

At a town hall–style meeting he hosted in St. Louis Biden told about 300 people that he’ll be asking the Treasury Department to figure out how to make college savings plans more effective and more reliable.

“We’re going to make a series of investments, investments in our families and our students,” he said, highlighting the administration’s efforts to improve tax breaks for families and increase need-based grants for low-and middle-income families.

White House Taps Existing Programs to Increase College Affordability

Since so many families save for college using tax-deferred 529 savings plans, which allow families to set aside funds to cover future tuition expenses, fees, books, and supplies, the Obama administration is examining a program that would allow families to take out low-interest loans against their 529 plans to help them cover college costs.

Obama has already increased funding for the need-based federal Pell Grant program, which helps low-income students afford school, but Biden said the Obama administration also wants to ensure continued Pell Grant funding by setting up the program to be automatically subsidized each year.

The government is also considering extending The American Opportunity Tax Credit beyond 2010, which allows families to claim a $2,500 tax credit for college expenses for up to four years.

But by far the most sweeping proposal from the Obama administration, which has drawn fierce criticism from leaders in the student loan industry, is the suggested cancelation of the federally funded student loan program.

Lenders say that cancelling the program will eliminate families’ option to choose from a variety of private lenders and federal student loan incentives and, instead, require them to borrow federal student loans through government’s Direct Loan Program.

Biden alleges that the move to cancel the federal student loan program would result in up to $94 billion in savings to the federal government over the next 10 years, which he said, “We can take … and reinvest … in more loans, more grants and more access to college.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

The Plot Thickens for the Future of Student Lending

Student Loan Girl — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:00:00 GMT

It’s “all hands on deck” for federal student loan lenders. The banks and third-party student loan providers that make up the Federal Family Education Loan Program have made it abundantly clear that they’re not going to roll over and accept the terms of the Obama administration’s proposal to axe their loan program in favor of the Education Department’s Direct Loan Program without a fight, The New York Times reports (“Plan to Change Student Lending Sets Up a Fight,” April 12, 2009)

“We can either meet or beat the budget savings that are in the president’s budget with the exact same system that we have got working now with maybe a few tweaks,” said Albert Lord, chief executive of Sallie Mae, the largest student loan provider participating in the FFEL program.

According to Congressional Budget Office calculations, establishing the Direct Loan Program as the sole provider of federal student loans is projected to save the government $94 billion over the next 10 years, savings that President Obama has said would be funneled directly into the federal Pell Grant Program for low-income students.

Lender-Proposed Alternatives Come Up Short

Lord and other FFELP lenders who oppose the administration’s plan are pushing for a compromise between the Obama plan and the current system that would allow them to continue offering students valuable lending services — quality customer relations, billing, and default prevention and collection — and still achieve Obama’s goal of saving taxpayers money.

FFELP lenders say such dually-beneficial partnerships are possible, which can be evidenced by a compromise that Congress approved last year that allows FFELP lenders to originate student loans using federal money and to resell the loans back to the government. FFELP lenders, which provide more than $56 billion of the nation’s federal student loans, were able to continue making loans to families and the government was able to ensure that families still had access to federal student loans.

But the savings Sallie Mae projects under its compromise plan still only add up to about 82 percent of the president’s savings goal over the next five years.

Supporters of the president’s plan say that this savings shortfall, as well as the fact that FFELP lenders are still relying on the government’s help to retain lending capital, raises the question, “why do we even need private lenders,” asked Representative Timothy Bishop, D–N.Y., a former provost of Southampton College.

Bishop argues that expanding the Direct Loan Program, which provides federal student loan funds directly to more than 1,500 schools is “obvious and long overdue,” being that over the last few decades private lenders have earned huge profits at relatively no risk because the government guarantees repayment up to 97 percent.

Factional In-Fighting Could Favor Lenders

In addition to battling lenders, lawmakers are also fighting an internal battle. Republicans say Obama’s plan is just another means to expand government control over the private sector, while Democrats are divided, with some legislators favoring the plan while others, who represent districts that rely heavily on student loan providers for employment, are siding with private lenders.

Allen Boyd, D–Fla., argues that the president’s proposal could jeopardize thousands of jobs across the country, including 650 in his own district, at a time when unemployment is already rampant. And the states that administer loans through state-based guarantee agencies, considered quasi-government entities that benefit the same as private lenders, are fighting to retain their lending business.

To help keep these quasi-government agencies afloat if they lose their FFELP business, the Obama administration has proposed spending $500 million a year on these agencies’ financial literacy programs and services.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Federal Student Loan Lenders Fight for Survival

Student Loan Girl — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 23:52:00 GMT

In what is being viewed as a direct hit to private third-party lenders in the Federal Family Education Loan Program who are fighting to keep the program alive, the U.S. Department of Education’s preliminary data paints the FFEL program as a costly and ineffective system with a 7.3-percent student loan default rate, two whole points higher than the default rate for the Direct Loan Program (“Private Lenders Brace for Fight Over Student-Loan Role,” The Wall Street Journal, March 27, 2009).

Since its launch in the 1960s, FFELP has been the primary source of federal student loans. This year the FFEL program has already lent more than $56 billion in student loans, while the Direct Loan Program has lent just $20 billion. But President Obama has proposed axing the FFEL program, which costs the federal government billions of dollars in subsidies each year, in favor of the government’s Direct Loan Program, through which families borrow directly from the government.

FFELP lenders have said that the Education Department’s untimely release of the student loan default rate data — taken from fiscal year 2007 — was purely political since the government has never released preliminary default rate data and has never broken down the data by the two programs. Industry analysts say the data reflects the differences in the two programs: FFELP lenders typically cater to more students from for-profit schools who tend to default at a higher rate than students in the Direct Loan Program.

Department of Education officials have said they released the data in response to a U.S. Freedom of Information Act request from The Wall Street Journal and inquiries from Congressional leaders.

“It’s unfortunate the rates are being released before there is an analysis of them,” said Brett Lief, president of the National Council of Higher Education Loan Programs, a trade group that represents FFELP lenders and federal loan guarantee agencies. “This is very serious stuff and I’m saddened that it has come out like this.”

No Cut-and-Dry Solution to the FFELP Dilemma

While the Consumer Bankers Association, which represents certain FFELP lenders, has sent Congress a 2,500-signature petition asking legislators to reject the president’s proposal to eliminate the FFEL program, industry observers don’t see the battle over FFELP ending quickly or simply.

The Congressional Budget Office has said eliminating the program would save the government nearly $100 billion over the next 10 years, which President Obama plans to redirect to the Federal Pell Grant program. This potential funding boost for Pell Grants, which are awarded to the nation’s neediest students, could make it harder for legislators who support FFELP to successfully argue to keep the program alive.

However, some legislators who oppose the FFEL program face strong opposition from their home-state guarantee agencies that work with FFELP lenders to service college loans for students in their state. Legislators may also have to battle student loan giant Sallie Mae, which has said that keeping certain elements of FFELP might actually make it possible for the government to draw additional Pell Grant funding from FFELP itself. Sallie Mae has also pointed out that its borrowers, who partake in default prevention programs through state loan-guarantee agencies, are 30 percent less likely to default than direct loan borrowers.

“It’s certainly possible Congress would eliminate the program,” said Terry Hartle, a senior vice president of the American Council of Education, a trade group representing colleges and universities. “But it’s equally possible — and perhaps more so — to wring more savings out of the [FFEL] program and put the savings into Pell.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Aid Administrators to Lawmakers: “Don’t Kill Guaranteed Student Loans”

Student Loan Girl — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:02:00 GMT

Just as Congress is about to vote on President Obama’s plan to end the government’s Federal Family Education Loan Program, through which families get their student loans from private third-party lenders, a lender advocacy group is urging lawmakers to consider an alternative to the president’s proposal, reports The Chronicle of Higher Education (“Student-Aid Administrators Urge Lawmakers to Reconsider Killing Guaranteed Loans,” March 19, 2009).

Currently, college students can take out student loans through private lenders using the FFEL program, or directly from the Department of Education through the government’s Direct Loan Program, which Obama hopes to establish as the sole provider of federal student loans.

Instead of doing away with FFELP lenders altogether, the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators proposes creating a new federal student loan model that would allow FFELP lenders to continue their participation in the federal student loan program, but under different roles.

FFEL Program Participants Would Serve New Roles

In a memo sent to Congress, NASFAA president Philip R. Day Jr. proposes that student loans be financed through the sale of government subsidized bonds to investors and that the proceeds be used to disburse student loans to colleges, who will in turn apply the funds directly to students’ accounts, similar to how direct lending functions today.

Under the NASFAA’s proposal, private lenders would no longer market college loans to students but could bid on Education Department contracts that would allow them to originate, disburse, and service the loans. Nonprofit agencies and former guarantors would no longer guarantee student loans, but would instead provide default- management services to students, including entrance and exit counseling on their repayment options.

A unique feature of NASFAA’s proposal would allow family members, friends, and private companies to receive a tax credit in exchange for paying off a portion or all of a borrower’s debt. State-based nonprofit lenders would still be allowed to offer loan-forgiveness programs for students entering in-demand professions.

Congress Urged to Consider Alternatives

Earlier last week, the NASFAA asked lawmakers to go slow when considering Obama’s plan. Lawmakers were also urged to engage in “deliberative” discussions regarding the future of student lending, The Chronicle reported, instead of just “ramming through” the government’s proposal to end the guaranteed lending program.

Obama’s plan aims to eliminate guaranteed lending for students through a budget resolution outlining the government’s spending plan.

If that resolution includes instructions to Congress’ education committees to consider Obama’s proposal by way of the budget reconciliation process, Day says it would be the death knell of the FFEL program and “prevent a full vetting of alternative proposals.”

The NASFAA has asked legislators to convene a stakeholder’s meeting to consider other viable options to reform the federal student loan program.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

More Schools Offering Direct Student Loans

Student Loan Girl — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:25:00 GMT

The direct student loan program — which President Obama wants to establish as the sole provider of federal student loans by 2010 — is swiftly gaining ground on the Federal Family Education Loan Program.

In the past year, the number of college and universities originating loans through the Direct Loan Program has increased by more than 50 percent, reports USA Today (“Government’s Direct Student Loan Program Gets a Boost,” March 10, 2009). More than 1,600 schools are offering direct loans, up from 548 schools in 2007, according to the Department of Education, while the number of schools offering FFELP loans fell by 3.6 percent during the same time period.

Currently, students are able to get federal student loans from one of two government programs: the Federal Family Education Loan Program, through which students borrow money from private third- party lenders that are subsidized by the government, or the Direct Loan Program, through which families borrow money directly from the Department of Education.

Direct Loan Program: The Future of Federal Student Loans

However, President Obama recently announced a plan that would eliminate the proven 44-year-old FFEL program, which is responsible for making three out of every four federal student loans. The move would transform the Direct Loan Program from a minority player in the student loan industry to the nation’s only originator of federal student loans.

The president’s plan could reduce the government’s student loan costs and save the government $4 billion, Obama administration officials suggest.

Critics of the president’s proposal — which include private student loan lenders — contest the government’s $4 billion savings estimate and fear that the Department of Education won’t be able to handle the surge in loan volume that would occur if the Direct Lending Program became the only originator of federal student loans. Families could be forced to endure poor customer service from an overburdened system, and could encounter difficulties in getting the funds they need for school, critics say.

Besides excellent customer service and a long-running track record of success, private lenders have another advantage over direct lending, says Barry Feierstein, executive vice president of Sallie Mae.

“Private lender and loan guarantors have a system to help borrowers avoid defaulting on their loans,” he says. “That level of outreach doesn't exist in the federal direct loan program.”

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

74% of Sallie Mae Loans Could Disappear Under Obama Plan

Student Loan Girl — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:21:00 GMT

Sallie Mae — the largest provider of college student loans in the country — may ultimately see three quarters of its student loan business evaporate under a plan by President Obama that would end government subsidies to third-party lenders and establish the federal government as the sole provider of federal student loans, reports Bloomberg.com (“Sallie Mae May Lose 74% of Loans Under Obama Budget,” Feb. 27, 2009).

Last year, the student loan giant made a total of $24.2 billion in student loans, with $17.9 billion, or 74 percent, backed or subsidized by the federal government.

If Obama’s plan is approved, students would no longer get their federal student loans through private third-party lenders participating in the Federal Family Education Loan Program — which currently provides the bulk of federal student loans to college students — and would instead get their federal student loan funds directly from the government through the Direct Loan Program.

The government’s new plan — a plan that financial analyst Matt Snowling of financial services firm Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co says has “blindsided” the student loan industry — threatens to reduce Sallie Mae to a debt collector and servicer for the government.

However, Sallie Mae isn’t likely to protest Obama’s new student loan strategy, says William Ryan, an analyst at Portales Partners, LLC, a New York-based stock rating service, since the lender is bidding on a contract to become the government’s servicer of student loans. That contract could bring in $250 million over four years according to analysts’ estimates.

While Education Secretary Arne Duncan has said that switching to government-funded student loans could save the government as much as $4 billion per year, Snowling says that the move could vastly alter the student loan marketplace, making borrowing much more difficult for students.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Direct Loan Program Gaining Ground on Bank-Based FFEL Program

Student Loan Girl — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:27:00 GMT

According to a recent survey of college financial aid directors, the federal government’s Direct Loan Program — through which families get federal student loans directly from the Department of Education — could eclipse the government’s now dominant Federal Family Education Loan Program by next school year.

The survey’s findings reveal that the bank–based FFEL program is losing its hold as schools’ loan program of choice, now that 168 FFELP lenders have suspended all or part of their federal student loan programs. Third-party lenders have continued to drop out of the FFEL program as the ongoing credit crisis has choked investor interest in federal student loans, crippling lenders’ ability to sell loans in order to originate enough capital to issue new ones.

Of the 416 colleges and universities surveyed in a Web-based poll by Student Lending Analytics, a company that provides colleges with financial aid advice, 6 percent of schools currently using the bank-based system plan to switch to direct lending for the 2009–10 academic year, and 29 percent are considering a migration to direct lending (“Direct Lending Could Overtake Bank-Based Student Loan Programs Next Year,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, Oct. 28, 2008).

If only 57 percent of those schools who said they were considering the switch actually made it, The Chronicle suggests, the Direct Loan Program would edge out the FFEL program as the leading supplier of federal student loans.

Currently, 1,458 colleges and universities use the Direct Loan Program, up from 1,010 colleges last school year, while the number of colleges using the FFEL program is down from 4,417 schools to 4,274.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Sen. Schumer Calls for Government to Protect Student Loans Amid Passage of $700 Billion Bailout Bill

Student Loan Girl — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:17:00 GMT

Concerned that students who are eligible to go to college won’t be able to pay for their education costs in light of the current credit crisis and a steadily worsening economy, Sen. Charles Schumer is urging the federal government to make sure student loans are still available, according to an Associated Press article (“Schumer Wants Student Loan market to Be Protected” Oct. 6, 2008).

Schumer recently wrote Secretary of Treasury Hank Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, advising them to keep tabs on the student loan market as the government implements a $700 billion bailout plan for the financial sector. The senator fears that the deteriorating credit market might burden college students with higher interest rates on loans or may prohibit borrowers from qualifying for student loans all together.

“The price we’ll pay will be that of a generation,” Schumer said.

Over 100 third-party lenders in the Federal Family Education Loan Program have suspended their participation in the federal student loan program, which is responsible for nearly half of all public and private student loan money, or about $60 billion. Students can access these federal student loan funds either through private lenders in the FFEL program, or through the government itself using the Direct Loan Program.

Schumer recommends that all colleges allow students to get loans through the government’s Direct Loan Program, instead of through a middleman, FFELP lender. The senator says he will be drafting letters to encourage New York college presidents and the American Council on Education to pursue a similar course of action.

Just last month, Congress passed legislation that will enable students who rely on loans to continue their education, regardless of the difficulties in the private credit market. The legislation is effective through the 2010 academic year.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Government’s Direct Lending Program Sees 43-Percent Increase in Volume

Student Loan Girl — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:36:00 GMT

As cash-strapped lenders continue to drop out of the Federal Family Education Loan Program, the number of student loans originated for the 2008–09 school year through the government’s Direct Loan Program has increased by 43 percent, reports The Chronicle of Higher Education (“As ‘Crisis’ Deters Loan Companies, Direct Lending Sees 43-Percent Jump,” Sept. 2, 2008).

Lenders in the FFEL Program — through which borrowers take out federal student loans through private, third-party lenders including banks, state agencies, and nonprofit lenders — have generally accounted for 80 percent of all federal student loan volume, according to the House Committee on Education and Labor (“The College Loan Landscape,” March 2008).

But the Direct Loan Program, which provides loans to students and parents directly from the Department of Education, is gaining ground. As of August 8, the Direct Loan Program had already originated more than $10.84 billion in federal student loans at 1,156 colleges and universities. At this time last year, the direct-lending program, had originated just $7.55 billion in loans at 851 institutions.

And although the exact figures have yet to be released, the Education Department estimates that the Direct Loan Program, which has generally made up 20 percent of all federal college loan volume, will soon be comparable in size to the FFEL program. FFELP lenders have only issued $13 billion in federal student loans at 3,230 colleges and universities this academic year, compared to the $55.8 billion in student loans they originated at 4,612 schools last year.

So Far, A Smooth Transition to Direct Lending

Government subsidy cuts to FFELP lenders enacted by the College Cost Reduction and Access Act last September, as well as continued fallout from the subprime mortgage crisis, have led more than 100 lenders to suspend their participation in the FFEL program.

By April of this year, some 5.8 percent of lenders remaining in the FFEL program had switched over to the direct-lending program and another 19.3 percent said they were considering the switch, according to Student Lending Analytics, a company that provides financial aid administrators with data about lenders (“Drift Toward Direct Lending (Update),” Inside Higher Ed, April 30, 2008).

Although some lenders questioned the Education Department’s ability to handle an increase in loan volume through its Direct Loan Program, some financial aid administrators say the Department of Education has done well in handling the influx of business.

Anna Griswold, executive director of student aid and assistant vice president for undergraduate education at Penn State, says she has been “pretty pleased” with the Direct Loan Program and has not experienced any glitches. Penn State, the 10th-largest FFELP lender last year, became a direct-lending school this year after its FFELP lender, the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, stopped offering federal student loans in February.

Penn State borrowers have already taken out $100 million in student loans this year through the direct-lending program.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Penn State’s Switch to Direct Loan Program Underway, So Far So Good

Student Loan Girl — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:43:00 GMT

Pennsylvania State University said its transition over to the federal Direct Loan Program is going “smoothly.” Already about 3,000 borrowers have taken out $5 million in student loans under the new program this summer, according to an article in The Daily Collegian (“PSU Direct Loan Program Successful,” July 11, 2008).

The university made the switch to the federal Direct Loan Program — in which students and parents borrow federal Stafford, graduate PLUS, or parent PLUS loans directly from the federal government — in March after the state’s student loan agency announced it would no longer be able to issue federal student loans.

More than 90 percent of Penn State’s borrowers were dropped by their federal student loan lenders after these private lenders, who were affected by the volatility of the nation’s credit markets, left the Federal Family Education Loan Program.

Wishing to offer students a more stable and predictable system of lending, Penn State decided to join the Direct Loan Program and move away from the FFEL program under which students could take out student loans through banks and private lenders.

“Our concern was that students might pick a [FFELP] lender, and that lender might subsequently quit making loans,” said Anna Griswold, Pennsylvania State’s executive director of student aid.

In the fall, Griswold estimates that about 40,000 Penn State students will borrow $400 million in student loans through the Direct Loan Program.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Back from Surgery, Kennedy Calls On Community Colleges to Switch to Direct Lending

Student Loan Girl — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:11:00 GMT

Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., sent a letter Monday to the American Association of Community Colleges, urging its members to enroll in the government’s Direct Loan Program in order to ensure community college students have access to student loans for the 2008–09 academic year.

Kennedy, the chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions who is recovering from surgery to remove part of a malignant brain tumor, encouraged AACC member colleges to sign up for the direct lending program, which allows students and parents to take out student loans directly from the U.S. Department of Education.

Almost 100 lenders in the rival Federal Family Education Loan Program, in which student loans are provided by private lenders, have reduced or stopped offering borrower incentives, or have dropped out of the FFEL program altogether.

Government subsidy cuts and the fallout from the subprime mortgage crisis have hurt lenders and have prompted some to announce they will no longer offer student loans to certain community colleges and other two-year institutions whose borrowers tend to carry smaller, less-profitable loans.

"Since lenders continue to say they may have to limit new loans to certain colleges, it’s possible that the neediest students, particularly those at community colleges, will need an alternative to the bank-based FFEL program," Kennedy wrote.

David Baime, vice president of government affairs for the AACC, countered that the problem is not that student loans are inaccessible, but that community college students tend to borrow more money than they can afford to repay ("Kennedy Urges Community Colleges to Enroll in Direct-Loan Program," June 17, 2008).

That’s why the association is pushing a measure through Congress, Baime says, that would give colleges the authority to reduce maximum college loan amounts that students could borrow under the federal student loan programs.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit

Survey Indicates Significant Number of Colleges May Switch to Direct Lending Program

Student Loan Girl — Thu, 08 May 2008 23:36:00 GMT

In the last few months, the number of lenders who have exited or suspended participation in the guaranteed Family Federal Education Loan Program has ballooned to 66 organizations, according to FinAid.org, leaving many schools wondering if their students will be able to get the money they need for school this fall.

The FFEL program, which funds the majority of federal student loans, has been abandoned by a handful of state universities, including Indiana, Michigan State and Pennsylvania State, in favor of the Direct Loan Program, according to an Inside Higher Ed article (“Drift Toward Direct Lending,” April 30, 2008).

Data from a new survey by Student Lending Analytics, suggests that the flow of institutions leaving the FFEL program for direct lending could be significant.

Some 28.9 percent of community colleges have contemplated moving to Direct Loan, while 7.2 percent have already decided to switch. Of the other colleges and universities in the FFEL program that responded to the survey, 19.3 percent said they were considering switching to direct lending, while 5.8 percent have already made the decision to do so.

Of those schools surveyed, almost 40 percent indicated a concern about the increasing number of lenders announcing they would no longer offer federal student loans as the main reason for making the transition. An additional 34 percent surveyed cited concerns about the financial stability of lenders.

Share this post: email this | del.icio.us | reddit